Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

U.S. Foodservice

29 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 29 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22, 25, 28 · Bensenville, IL; Boston, MA; Corona, CA; Englewood, NJ; Fife, WA; Freedom, PA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	24
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	1
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2014Case 12-CA-124188ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2011Case 21-CA-062282ClosedCorona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
U. S. Foodservice
CA
Filed 8 June 2011Case 13-CA-046787ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2011Case 01-CA-046730ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 115
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2010Case 19-CA-032776ClosedFife, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 87
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2010Case 33-CA-016106ClosedStreator, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2010Case 07-CA-053088ClosedWixom, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 07-CA-052734ClosedWixom, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 150
U. S. FoodService
CA
Filed 2 June 2009Case 08-CA-038362ClosedTwinsburg, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 74
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 7 October 2008Case 17-RD-001778ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 72
Included: All drivers and warehousemen located in, Omaha, Nebraska Excluded: Office clerical employees, professional employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and all other employees
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 31 March 2008Case 22-RC-012901ClosedEnglewood, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 3
Included: Switch and Shuttle Drivers Excluded: All other employees
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 30 January 2008Case 22-UC-000327ClosedEnglewood, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 69
Inc. All Drivers. Exc. All other Employees.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 September 2007Case 18-RC-017533ClosedGrand Forks, NDRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Included: All full time and regular part time drivers, warehouseman, building and ground maintenance and customer pick-up. Excluded: Management, supervisory, clerical, and security as defined in the act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2007Case 05-CA-033779ClosedSevern, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 160
U. S. Foodservice
CA
Filed 5 April 2007Case 28-CA-021310ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 200
U. S. Foodservice
CA
Filed 21 December 2006Case 07-CA-050038ClosedWixom, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2006Case 13-CA-043333ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2005Case 13-CA-043025ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2005Case 36-CA-009757ClosedRidgefield, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
U. S. Foodservice
CA
Filed 26 February 2004Case 30-CA-016749ClosedMenomonee Falls, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2004Case 34-CA-010775ClosedSouth Windsor, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2003Case 13-CA-041473ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2003Case 06-CA-033239ClosedFreedom, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 65
U. S. Foodservice
CA
Filed 15 November 2002Case 17-CA-021977ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2002Case 17-CA-021955ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2002Case 21-CA-035310ClosedLa Mirada, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2002Case 13-CA-040402ClosedBensenville, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 90
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 May 2002Case 18-RC-016990ClosedSioux Falls, SDRegion 18Workers in the unit 7
Included: All employees employed by the employer at 201 S. Petro Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD, including all route and shuttle drivers. Excluded: All office employees, guards and managers as defined by the Act as amended.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2000Case 18-CA-015818ClosedPlymouth, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 225

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.