Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES

30 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 30 are marked open by the Board · Region 02, 09, 20, 21, 22, 25, 31, 32 · BURNS HARBOR, IN; Burns Harbor, IN; COLUMBUS, OH; Jersey City, NJ; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	28
RC	Petition for an election	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2016Case 21-CA-183506ClosedPalm Springs, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 30
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 31 August 2016Case 20-CA-183351ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 17 August 2016Case 25-RC-182348ClosedBurns Harbor, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 46
lncluded: All full-time and part-time armed and unarmed security officers & dispatchers performing guard duties as defined in Section 9(B)(3) of the NLRA, employed by Universal Protection Services at Arcelor Mittal, Burns Harbor, IN 46304. Excluded: All office clerical employees, professional employees and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 August 2016Case 25-RC-181800ClosedBURNS HARBOR, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 46
ALL FULL-TIME AND PART-TIME ARMED AND UNARMED SECURITY OFFICERS 7 DISPATCHERS PEFORMING GUARD DUTIES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 9(B)(3) OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT, EMPLOYED BY UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES@ARCELOR-MITTAL, BURNS HARBOR IN 46304 & ARCELOR MITTAL, INDIANA HARBOR, 3300 DICKEY RD, EAST CHICAGO, IN 46312
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2016Case 21-CA-176648ClosedSAN DIEGO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 2,000
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 8 March 2016Case 22-CA-171761ClosedJersey City, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 30
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 10 April 2015Case 32-CA-149901ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 19 February 2015Case 31-CA-146953ClosedSanta Ana, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 20 June 2014Case 20-CA-131331ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 63
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 17 June 2014Case 02-CA-130994ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2014Case 21-CA-129429ClosedSANTA ANA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2014Case 21-CA-125067ClosedSAN DIEGO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 25
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 10 February 2014Case 20-CA-122410ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 300
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 16 December 2013Case 20-CA-119207ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 78
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2013Case 21-CA-115071ClosedSANTA ANA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 138
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 3 June 2013Case 20-CA-106393ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 78
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2013Case 21-CA-105719ClosedSANTA ANA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 42
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 9 May 2013Case 20-CA-104779ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 78
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 23 April 2013Case 20-CA-103602ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 2 April 2013Case 20-CA-101838ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2013Case 09-CA-101324ClosedWORTHINGTON, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 8 March 2013Case 20-CA-100027ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 78
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2013Case 09-CA-099400ClosedWORTHINGTON, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2013Case 09-CA-098620ClosedCOLUMBUS, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2012Case 09-CA-094983ClosedCOLUMBUS, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 6 November 2012Case 21-CA-092752ClosedOceanside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 42
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 7 May 2010Case 31-CA-029710ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 400
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 26 January 2010Case 31-CA-029574ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 6
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 10 November 2009Case 31-CA-029491ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 6
Universal Protection Services
CA
Filed 17 August 2004Case 21-CA-036479ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 30

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.