Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

UPS Freight

246 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 246 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 04, 05, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · Albuquerque, NM; Atlanta, GA; BETHLEHEM, PA; Bakersfield, CA; Bay Shore, NY; Bedford Park, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	234
RC	Petition for an election	5
RD	Petition to decertify	7

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2013Case 12-CA-110829ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 75
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 22 April 2013Case 09-CA-103337ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2012Case 32-CA-094591ClosedFRESNO, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 19,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2012Case 25-CA-091017ClosedOswego, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2012Case 08-CA-089874ClosedMasury, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089243ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089241ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089234ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089231ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089229ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089223ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089220ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089215ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089190ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089187ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089182ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089176ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089172ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2012Case 30-CA-089171ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2012Case 30-CA-088727ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2012Case 26-CA-087231ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2012Case 32-CA-080651ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2012Case 32-CA-077149ClosedSunnyvale, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2012Case 32-CA-076865ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 March 2012Case 13-CA-076167ClosedPalatine, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 7 March 2012Case 09-CA-076102ClosedCOLUMBUS, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2012Case 12-CA-074287ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2012Case 13-CA-074066ClosedPalatine, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2012Case 26-CA-071895ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2011Case 26-CA-070774ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 6 December 2011Case 25-CA-070205ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 6 December 2011Case 25-CA-070188ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2011Case 05-CA-068942ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 151
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2011Case 32-CA-066955ClosedSunnyvale, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 18 July 2011Case 32-CA-025797ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 12,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2011Case 09-CA-061302ClosedSHARONVILLE, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 28 June 2011Case 09-CA-060679ClosedSHARONVILLE, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 120
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 13 May 2011Case 09-CA-060107ClosedSHARONVILLE, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2011Case 21-CA-039775ClosedPico Rivera, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 March 2011Case 27-RC-008640ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 7
Included: Mechanics Excluded: Management, Supervisors, Office Clerical and Guards.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 March 2011Case 32-RC-005816ClosedLathrop, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 3
Included: All office employees and/or clerks. Excluded: All others
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2010Case 21-CA-039462ClosedOntario, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2010Case 04-CA-037528ClosedStowe, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2010Case 31-CA-029706ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2010Case 16-CA-027312ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2010Case 21-CA-039230ClosedCommerce, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 275
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2009Case 14-CA-029970ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2009Case 12-CA-026529ClosedOcoee, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 17,150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2009Case 16-CA-027100ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 14-CA-029896ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2009Case 30-CA-018441ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2009Case 15-CA-019259ClosedDothan, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2009Case 31-CA-029379ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 11-CA-022388ClosedGaffney, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 108
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2009Case 11-CA-022381ClosedConover, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2009Case 12-CA-026420ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2009Case 12-CA-026419ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2009Case 21-CA-038730ClosedPico Rivera, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
UPS FREIGHT
RD
Filed 16 January 2009Case 10-RD-001483ClosedKnoxville, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 3
Included Part-time and full-time employees preferring work in the following classifications: check bay attendant, plant/facility maintenance, tire changers, tire leadman, tire mechanic, parts clerk and plant/facility meaintenance leadman in Knoxville, Tennessee Excluded Drivers, dock workers, jockeys, office clericals, supervisors and guards
UPS, Freight
RD
Filed 22 December 2008Case 27-RD-001219ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Included: All part-time and full-time employees performing work in the following classifications: check bay attendant, plant/facility maintenance and leadman mechanic, mechanic leadman, tire changer, tire leadman, tire mechanic, and parts clerk. Excluded: All drivers, dock workers, jockeys, office clericals, supervisors and guards as defined by the act employer's facility at 2900 W. California Avenue Salt Lake City, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2008Case 12-CA-026098ClosedDothan, ALRegion 12Workers in the unit 35
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 November 2008Case 05-RD-001448ClosedMechanicsburg, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 616
Included: Dock Worker, Road Drivers, City Drivers, Jockeys Excluded: Any and all positions not listed above
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2008Case 28-CA-022225ClosedAlbuquerque, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2008Case 31-CA-028986ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 17
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2008Case 21-CA-038567ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 01-CA-045013ClosedBillerica, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 01-CA-045012ClosedBillerica, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 01-CA-045011ClosedBillerica, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 01-CA-045010ClosedBillerica, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2008Case 01-CA-045009ClosedBillerica, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
UPS - Freight
CA
Filed 23 September 2008Case 32-CA-024123ClosedSunnyvale, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
UPS - Freight
CA
Filed 16 September 2008Case 32-CA-024107ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2008Case 15-CA-018776ClosedDothan, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2008Case 12-CA-025986ClosedDothan, ALRegion 12Workers in the unit 35
UPS-Freight
RD
Filed 31 July 2008Case 20-RD-002459ClosedSanta Rosa, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 19
All hourly employees employed by the Employer at its 35 Frances Street, Santa Rosa, California facility as drivers, either over the road or city, as well as hourly employees engaged in dock work, checking, stacking, loading, unloading, handling, shipping, receiving, switching, fork lift, rigging, stuffing, stripping, loading and discharging of cargo or containers; excluding all office clericals, mechanics, ...
UPS-Freight
RD
Filed 29 July 2008Case 20-RD-002458ClosedSanta Rosa, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 19
All full-time and regular part-time drivers and dockworkers employed at the Employer's facility located at 35 Frances Street, Santa Rosa, California, excluding all other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2008Case 21-CA-038303ClosedCommerce, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2008Case 16-CA-026136ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2008Case 21-CA-038297ClosedCommerce, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 17 March 2008Case 29-RD-001103ClosedBay Shore, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 65
Included: Full time and regular part time city drivers road drivers dlock workers and swithcers employed by the Employer at its 240A skip Lane Bayshore New York location. Excluded: All guards and supervisors as defined under the National Labor Relations Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 November 2007Case 31-RC-008670ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 17
Included: All Regular Full-Time and Part-Time Delivery Truck Drivers and Duck Workers Employed by the Employer at the above named location 600 William Street, Bakersfield, California. Excluded: All Managers, Supervisors, other Employees, Guards and Secretaries as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2007Case 32-CA-023518ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2007Case 21-CA-037910ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 26-CA-022796ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2007Case 02-CA-038327ClosedMontgomery, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2007Case 32-CA-023298ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2007Case 32-CA-023227ClosedNevada, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2007Case 32-CA-023226ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2007Case 32-CA-023225ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 32Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2007Case 02-CA-038212ClosedMontgomery, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2007Case 01-CA-043886ClosedManchester, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
UPS FREIGHT
CA
Filed 9 February 2007Case 25-CA-030254ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 138
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 10 January 2007Case 32-RD-001519ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 72
Included: All full time and part time dockhands - P & D drivers and line drivers emplyed by the Employer at the Reno, NV facility. Excluded: All office personnel if employed and managers and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 December 2006Case 29-RC-011407ClosedBay Shore, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 35
Included: All full time partime drivers warehouse workers dock workers and shifters Excluded: All office clerical employees sales persons professional employees dispatchers seasonal employees guards and supervisors as defined in the act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2006Case 26-CA-022522ClosedTupelo, MSRegion 15Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2006Case 32-CA-022741ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 50

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.