Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

USF Reddaway

64 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 64 are marked open by the Board · Region 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28, 32 · Alleghany, CA; Anderson, CA; Boise, ID; Clackamas, OR; Compton, CA; Houston, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	56
RD	Petition to decertify	8

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 December 2023Case 19-CA-332243OpenTualatin, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2023Case 19-CA-321031OpenTualatin, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2019Case 32-CA-248338ClosedTracy, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2014Case 32-CA-140562ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
USF REDDAWAY
CA
Filed 22 October 2014Case 21-CA-139344ClosedORANGE, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2010Case 20-CA-035220ClosedAlleghany, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2010Case 20-CA-035219ClosedAlleghany, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2010Case 20-CA-035204ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2010Case 20-CA-035174ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2010Case 20-CA-035170ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 July 2010Case 20-CA-035163ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2010Case 20-CA-035081ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2010Case 20-CA-035077ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 66
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 3 May 2010Case 20-RD-002486ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 64
All fulltime and Part time Employee's in over the road driver City pickup and Delivery driver and dock hostler job classification at its terminal facility located at 2065-B Alexander Avenue, Alexander, CA 96007. Excluded: All other Employee's, Office Clerical Employee's Managers, Guards and Supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2009Case 19-CA-032162ClosedKent, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2008Case 20-CA-034217ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2008Case 27-CA-020865ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2008Case 20-CA-033883ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2008Case 27-CA-020804ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2008Case 27-CA-020787ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 31 January 2008Case 27-RD-001207ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 69
Included: All employees employed by the Employer in the Over-the-road driver, city pick-up and delivery driver, and dock/hostler job classifications. Reglar and probationary employees. Excluded:
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2008Case 27-CA-020752ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2008Case 27-CA-020751ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2008Case 27-CA-020750ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2008Case 27-CA-020734ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 72
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2008Case 20-CA-033752ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 January 2008Case 20-RD-002450ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 90
Included: All over-the-road drivers, city pick-up and delivery drivers, and dock/hostler job classifications at its Sacramento, California terminal facility Excluded: supervisors
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 20 December 2007Case 27-RD-001205ClosedBoise, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 73
Included: All Dock Workers, City Truck Drivers and Linehaul Drivers Employed by the Employer at and from its Boise, Idaho facility. Excluded: All Office Clerical employees, Managers, Guards and Supervisors within the meaning of the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2007Case 20-CA-033697ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2007Case 16-CA-025884ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2007Case 20-CA-033669ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2007Case 16-CA-025791ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2007Case 17-CA-023952ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2007Case 20-CA-033546ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 15 August 2007Case 32-RD-001545ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 60
Included: All drivers and dock workers. Excluded: Managers, office clerical employees, guards and supervisors.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2007Case 32-CA-023461ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2007Case 20-CA-033544ClosedStockton, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2007Case 20-CA-033538ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2007Case 32-CA-023451ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2007Case 20-CA-033539ClosedStockton, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 32-CA-023378ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 32-CA-023377ClosedSan Leandro, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 20-CA-033507ClosedModesto, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 20-CA-033506ClosedSan Leandro, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2007Case 32-CA-023320ClosedSan Leandro, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2007Case 20-CA-033469ClosedSan Leandro, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2007Case 21-CA-037824ClosedCompton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2007Case 28-CA-021411ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 139
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2007Case 28-CA-021395ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 139
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2007Case 20-CA-033426ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2007Case 32-CA-023248ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2007Case 20-CA-033445ClosedModesto, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 35
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 8 May 2007Case 21-RD-002834ClosedCompton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Included: All drivers, checkers and dockworkers employed by the Employer at its facility located at 575 East Weber Avenue, Compton, California; Excluded: All other employees, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2007Case 21-CA-037770ClosedCompton, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2007Case 21-CA-037749ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 69
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2007Case 20-CA-033395ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 17 April 2007Case 21-RD-002831ClosedPomona, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 36
Included Pickup and delivery and line drivers, dock workers and yard hostlers
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2007Case 28-CA-021322ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2007Case 20-CA-033357ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2007Case 32-CA-023076ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2007Case 20-CA-033326ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 February 2007Case 20-RD-002440ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Included: All full-time and regular part-time drivers and dockworkers; Excluded: All other employees, guards, and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2005Case 19-CA-029663ClosedKent, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 152
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 1999Case 36-CA-008490ClosedClackamas, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 300

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.