Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Verizon

329 cases in this site's copy of the record · 4 of those 329 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 10, 12, 14, 16, 21, 22, 25, 29, 31 · Albany, NY; Andover, MA; Annapolis, MD; Ashburn, VA; Athens, OH; BASKING RIDGE, NJ and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	324
RC	Petition for an election	5

The cases

Page 2 of 3, newest first: 1 2 3

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2010Case 03-CA-027537ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2010Case 16-CA-027282ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2010Case 29-CA-030002ClosedRidgewood, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2009Case 01-CA-045825ClosedLunenburg, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2009Case 29-CA-029943ClosedQueens, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2009Case 29-CA-029942ClosedQueens, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2009Case 16-CA-027134ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 275
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2009Case 01-CA-045774ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 16-CA-027090ClosedGarland, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2009Case 01-CA-045705ClosedChelmsford, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2009Case 01-CA-045691ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2009Case 02-CA-039506ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 25,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 22-CA-029097ClosedRoseland, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2009Case 22-CA-029078ClosedMadison, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 August 2009Case 01-RC-022353ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 190
Included: All office plant engineers working in Massachusetts and Rhode Island Excluded: All management employees covered under the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2009Case 16-CA-026898ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2009Case 29-CA-029628ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2009Case 02-CA-039317ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2009Case 01-CA-045430ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2009Case 05-CA-035006ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2009Case 05-CA-034991ClosedPowhatan, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2009Case 02-CA-039299ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 24,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2009Case 01-CA-045397ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2009Case 16-CA-026759ClosedGarland, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2009Case 01-CA-045354ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2009Case 01-CA-045353ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2009Case 21-CA-038814ClosedMenifee, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2009Case 05-CA-034836ClosedHanover, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2009Case 01-CA-045305ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2009Case 05-CA-034801ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2009Case 01-CA-045206ClosedProvidence, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2009Case 05-CA-034776ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 29-CA-029454ClosedSaint Albans, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2009Case 01-CA-045178ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 December 2008Case 01-RC-022289ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 50
All specialists in the sales departments, to be included in existing bargaining unit Arbour-Globe
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2008Case 01-CA-045099ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2008Case 01-CA-045098ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2008Case 22-CA-028677ClosedWashington, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2008Case 05-CA-034637ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2008Case 16-CA-026495ClosedRobstown, TXRegion 16
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2008Case 22-CA-028642ClosedFreehold, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2008Case 21-CA-038584ClosedLa Habra, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2008Case 16-CA-026479ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 16-CA-026474ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 3,100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 October 2008Case 01-RC-022274ClosedBasking Ridge, NJRegion 01Workers in the unit 227
Included: All Verizon construction engineers who work in Massachusetts and Rhode Island Excluded; All managers as defined by the National Labor Relations Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2008Case 16-CA-026460ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 25
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 October 2008Case 01-RC-022266ClosedBasking Ridge, NJRegion 01Workers in the unit 6
All Regional Engineers in New England All managers as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 October 2008Case 01-RC-022265ClosedBasking Ridge, NJRegion 01Workers in the unit 6
Included: All facilities support techs in New England Excluded: All managers covered under the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2008Case 16-CA-026415ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2008Case 16-CA-026406ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2008Case 17-CA-024262ClosedDallas, TXRegion 14Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2008Case 16-CA-026373ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2008Case 01-CA-044850ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2008Case 17-CA-024240ClosedDallas, TXRegion 14Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2008Case 16-CA-026336ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2008Case 02-CA-038818ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2008Case 22-CA-028309ClosedHopelawn, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2008Case 01-CA-044532ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2008Case 29-CA-028796ClosedRosedale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2008Case 01-CA-044486ClosedProvidence, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2008Case 05-CA-034112ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 January 2008Case 12-CA-025691ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2007Case 16-CA-025951ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2007Case 16-CA-025940ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2007Case 16-CA-025935ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2007Case 16-CA-025934ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2007Case 16-CA-025932ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2007Case 16-CA-025931ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2007Case 05-CA-033947ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2007Case 05-CA-033946ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2007Case 05-CA-033943ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2007Case 05-CA-033942ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2007Case 16-CA-025912ClosedLewisville, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 01-CA-044278ClosedTaunton, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2007Case 01-CA-044275ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2007Case 01-CA-044274ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2007Case 01-CA-044273ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2007Case 16-CA-025895ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2007Case 16-CA-025894ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2007Case 01-CA-044250ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2007Case 01-CA-044237ClosedNorth Reading, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2007Case 01-CA-044200ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2007Case 05-CA-033822ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2007Case 05-CA-033821ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2007Case 22-CA-028045ClosedRochelle Park, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2007Case 16-CA-025719ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2007Case 16-CA-025716ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 July 2007Case 16-CA-025715ClosedGarland, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 167
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2007Case 29-CA-028401ClosedNew York, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2007Case 03-CA-026388ClosedNew York, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2007Case 03-CA-026381ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 05-CA-033694ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2007Case 05-CA-033676ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2007Case 31-CA-028292ClosedSan Bernardino, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2007Case 03-CA-026301ClosedDe Witt, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 30,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2007Case 03-CA-026299ClosedBallston Spa, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2007Case 05-CA-033566ClosedStafford, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 210,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2007Case 04-CA-035319ClosedFalls Church, VARegion 04Workers in the unit 217,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2007Case 03-CA-026255ClosedDe Witt, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2007Case 05-CA-033537ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2007Case 05-CA-033536ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2007Case 02-CA-038171ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2007Case 12-CA-025355ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2007Case 03-CA-026240ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2007Case 05-CA-033508ClosedColumbia, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 300,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2007Case 05-CA-033453ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2007Case 03-CA-026194ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2007Case 05-CA-033430ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2007Case 06-CA-035455ClosedBloomsburg, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2007Case 04-CA-035123ClosedBloomsburg, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 4
VERIZON
CA
Filed 4 January 2007Case 09-CA-043362ClosedCharleston, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2006Case 12-CA-025274ClosedNew York, NYRegion 12Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2006Case 01-CA-043705ClosedNew York, NYRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 22-CA-027761ClosedShrewsbury, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2006Case 16-CA-025356ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2006Case 02-CA-038019ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2006Case 02-CA-037997ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2006Case 01-CA-043626ClosedProvidence, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2006Case 01-CA-043616ClosedManchester, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2006Case 01-CA-043615ClosedAndover, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2006Case 01-CA-043614ClosedAndover, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2006Case 01-CA-043612ClosedManchester, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2006Case 02-CA-037979ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 16-CA-025297ClosedSan Angelo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2006Case 21-CA-037539ClosedLong Beach, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2006Case 22-CA-027650ClosedShrewsbury, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2006Case 02-CA-037961ClosedBronx, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2006Case 01-CA-043536ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2006Case 01-CA-043500ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2006Case 31-CA-027994ClosedThousand Oaks, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 600
VERIZON
CA
Filed 14 September 2006Case 09-CA-043108ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2006Case 16-CA-025156ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2006Case 29-CA-027879ClosedNew York, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 10,000
VERIZON
CA
Filed 22 August 2006Case 09-CA-043049ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
VERIZON
CA
Filed 16 August 2006Case 09-CA-043031ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2006Case 16-CA-025133ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2006Case 03-CA-025964ClosedAlbany, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 500
VERIZON
CA
Filed 6 June 2006Case 09-CA-042885ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2006Case 16-CA-024952ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2006Case 03-CA-025856ClosedMenands, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2006Case 16-CA-024834ClosedIrving, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2006Case 03-CA-025782ClosedSyracuse, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2005Case 22-CA-027213ClosedRobbinsville, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2005Case 03-CA-025689ClosedNew York, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2005Case 03-CA-025486ClosedHamburg, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2005Case 03-CA-025455ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 7,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2005Case 01-CA-042511ClosedBangor, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 203,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2004Case 03-CA-025100ClosedPotsdam, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2004Case 01-CA-041996ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2004Case 01-CA-041780ClosedOrleans, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25

Page 2 of 3, newest first: 1 2 3

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.