Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Weyerhaeuser Company

67 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 67 are marked open by the Board · Region 06, 07, 08, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21, 25, 32 · Anaheim, CA; Campti, LA; Chicago, IL; Cottage Grove, OR; Dodson, LA; Johnsonburg, PA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	63
RC	Petition for an election	2
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2025Case 19-CA-362372ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2023Case 32-CA-318619ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2023Case 19-CA-317196ClosedRaymond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2022Case 32-CA-300020ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2022Case 32-CA-295919ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 May 2022Case 32-RC-295706ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1
Included: All full and regular part-time Administrative Assistant. Excluded: Supervisors/Guards.
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 10 December 2020Case 19-UC-270045ClosedRochester, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 38
Present Unit: Included: All employees in the Pe Ell Forest Area (Yard & Load, Maintenance, and Road Maintenance Classifications). Excluded: All others. Proposed Unit: Included: All employees in the Pe Ell Forest Area (Yard & Load, Maintenance, and Road Maintenance Classifications) including the Rochester Seed Plant (Seed Plant Technican and Seedman). Excluded: All others.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2020Case 10-CA-262493ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2018Case 19-CA-230109ClosedCottage Grove, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 191
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2017Case 15-CA-192900ClosedZwolle, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2016Case 15-CA-189440ClosedZwolle, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 January 2016Case 19-CA-168175ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2015Case 10-CA-164929ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2015Case 10-CA-164926ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 19-CA-148309ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2015Case 19-CA-148308ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2014Case 15-CA-140380ClosedDodson, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2014Case 19-CA-131148ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2014Case 19-CA-130249ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2014Case 19-CA-129986ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2014Case 19-CA-129973ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2014Case 19-CA-128740ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2014Case 19-CA-128688ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2014Case 19-CA-127561ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2014Case 19-CA-127090ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2014Case 19-CA-127089ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2014Case 19-CA-122853ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 405
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2014Case 19-CA-121028ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 405
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2014Case 19-CA-120926ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2012Case 19-CA-090767ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2011Case 19-CA-033095ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2011Case 11-CA-023099ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2011Case 19-CA-033069ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2010Case 36-CA-010747ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2010Case 19-CA-032765ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2010Case 19-CA-032555ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2010Case 19-CA-032512ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2010Case 19-CA-032511ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2010Case 19-CA-032502ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 March 2010Case 19-CA-032393ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2010Case 19-CA-032351ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2010Case 11-CA-022574ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 November 2009Case 11-CA-022494ClosedPlymouth, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 July 2009Case 19-CA-032005ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2009Case 19-CA-031771ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2008Case 19-CA-031472ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2008Case 19-CA-031387ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2008Case 19-CA-031385ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 May 2008Case 36-RC-006413ClosedSalem, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 16
All full time and part time Production, Warehouse, Shipping and Lab employees; excluding all other employees, Maintenance employees, Officer Clerical Employees, Custodial employees, Guards and Supervisory employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2008Case 17-CA-024073ClosedWright City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2008Case 07-CA-050995ClosedThree Rivers, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 117
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2008Case 17-CA-024067ClosedWright City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2007Case 17-CA-024045ClosedWright City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 1 November 2007Case 19-UC-000757ClosedLongview, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 165
Included: Lumber Manufacturing and Finishing - Longview Mill.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2007Case 15-CA-018342ClosedCampti, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2007Case 21-CA-037830ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 184
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2007Case 21-CA-037822ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2007Case 21-CA-037704ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 21-CA-037643ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 184
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2007Case 21-CA-037642ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 184
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2006Case 06-CA-035354ClosedJohnsonburg, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2006Case 13-CA-043609ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2006Case 08-CA-036779ClosedMount Vernon, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 8
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2006Case 33-CA-015190ClosedRockford, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 118
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2005Case 21-CA-036944ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2003Case 18-CA-016864ClosedWaterloo, IARegion 18Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2001Case 36-CA-008930ClosedSpringfield, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 500

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.