Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Xcel Energy

54 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 54 are marked open by the Board · Region 16, 18, 27, 28 · Amarillo, TX; Borger, TX; Brush, CO; Denver, CO; Fort Collins, CO; Grand Junction, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	48
RC	Petition for an election	5
RD	Petition to decertify	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2025Case 18-CA-361558ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10,000
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 6 November 2024Case 18-RD-354280ClosedLa Crosse, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 5
Included: Instrument and Controls Techs at Xcel French Island, Xcel Bayfront, Xcel Wheaten. Excluded: Managers, Supervisors, other employees as these locations defined in act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2024Case 27-CA-351441ClosedGrand Junction, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2024Case 18-CA-346666ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2023Case 27-CA-314705ClosedBrush, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2023Case 27-CA-312563ClosedFort Collins, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2023Case 27-CA-312300ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2022Case 18-CA-297781ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 11,321
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2021Case 27-CA-288200ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2021Case 27-CA-280941ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 3,783
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2020Case 28-CA-269717ClosedRoswell, NMRegion 28Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2020Case 27-CA-269666ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2020Case 18-CA-259681ClosedMonticello, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2020Case 27-CA-258753ClosedKeenesburg, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2019Case 27-CA-234112ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 3,783
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2018Case 16-CA-223614ClosedBorger, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 8 June 2018Case 18-CA-221750ClosedWelch, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2017Case 27-CA-210768ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2017Case 27-CA-206783ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 65
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 21 August 2017Case 18-CA-204715ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2017Case 16-CA-196874ClosedAmarillo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2016Case 27-CA-174176ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 10 December 2015Case 16-CA-165963ClosedLubbock, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2015Case 16-CA-161902ClosedLubbock, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10,000
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 24 September 2015Case 18-CA-160665ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 12,469
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2014Case 27-CA-137580ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 35
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 11 February 2013Case 27-CA-098026ClosedKeenesburg, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2012Case 27-CA-080869ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2012Case 27-CA-080868ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 20
XCEL ENERGY
CA
Filed 19 January 2012Case 18-CA-072714ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2011Case 27-CA-067107ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2011Case 18-CA-062806ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2011Case 27-CA-021838ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2010Case 27-CA-021783ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2010Case 18-CA-019323ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2009Case 18-CA-019240ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2009Case 18-CA-019147ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2009Case 18-CA-019110ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2008Case 18-CA-018903ClosedMonticello, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2008Case 18-CA-018883ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2008Case 18-CA-018805ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 18-CA-018485ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2007Case 16-CA-025702ClosedLubbock, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2006Case 18-CA-017911ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 545
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 March 2003Case 18-RC-017125ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
Included: All full-time and regular part-time unrepresented business process specialists employed by the Employer at the Sherco plant, Black Dog plant, and Riverside plant to be added to the existing unit of business processing specialists at the same plants. (GLOBE ELECTION)
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2003Case 18-CA-016719ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 615
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2002Case 18-CA-016590ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 19 June 2002Case 18-RC-017012ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1
Included: All full-time distribution operation assistants employed by the Employer out of its Chestnut Service Center, excluding office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees. Petitioner seeks to add this classification to the existing bargaining unit covered by the Metro West Labor Agreement.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2002Case 18-CA-016444ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 402
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2002Case 18-CA-016351ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 January 2002Case 18-RC-016932ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 25
All full-time and regular part-time Business Support Specialists, Coordinators, Schedulers and Closers; excluding all office clerical employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisors, as defined in the NLRB Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 December 2001Case 18-RC-016931ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 4
All full-time & regular part-time Locator/Tech. working for Xcel Energy - North Dakota Region. The Union is seeking an Armour-Globe election to include the petitioned-for unit with the unit members already represented by the Union & described in Agreement, Section 1 dated 1-1-01 to 12-31-04. Excluding: All office clerical employees, professional employees, managerial employees, guards & supervisors, as defined in ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 November 2001Case 18-RC-016903ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Included: All full-time and regular part-time gas and electric designers working for Xcel Energy North; The Union is seeking an Armour-Globe election to included the petitioned-for unit with the unit members already represented by the Union and described in Article III, Local 953 Labor Agreement (Exhibit A) dated Januray 1, 2000 to December 31, 2004. Excluded: excluding all clericals, professional employees, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2001Case 18-CA-016016ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.