Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Aramark

252 cases in this site's copy of the record · 7 of those 252 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · Arlington, TX; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Beaver, PA; Berkeley, MO; Boston, MA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	226
RC	Petition for an election	18
RD	Petition to decertify	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	3
UD	Petition on union security	1

The cases

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 4 August 2026Case 14-RD-392219ClosedSaint Joseph, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 33
Included: Cooks food service. Excluded: Excluding all others as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2026Case 14-CA-391233OpenWentzville, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 150
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 25 June 2026Case 07-CA-390009OpenWarren, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2026Case 04-CA-387512OpenWernersville, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2026Case 20-CA-386910ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2026Case 20-CA-381605ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 January 2026Case 05-CA-380138OpenWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 8
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2026Case 20-CA-379446ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2026Case 14-CA-379057OpenBerkeley, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2025Case 05-CA-376140ClosedHarrisonburg, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2025Case 05-CA-376139ClosedHarrisonburg, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2025Case 01-CA-372087OpenWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2025Case 20-CA-370095ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 583
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2025Case 05-CA-368063ClosedHarrisonburg, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2025Case 05-CA-367124ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2025Case 04-CA-365119ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2025Case 01-CA-363211ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2025Case 04-CA-360387ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2025Case 04-CA-358865ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2024Case 27-CA-352406ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2024Case 10-CA-344749ClosedWilmington, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 May 2024Case 20-CA-341781ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2024Case 28-CA-337616ClosedTempe, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 316
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2024Case 10-CA-334693ClosedVinton, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2024Case 04-CA-334051ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2023Case 18-CA-328614ClosedGolden Valley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2023Case 02-CA-328805OpenManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2023Case 31-CA-328319ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2023Case 18-CA-326509ClosedFridley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2023Case 16-CA-324838ClosedWaco, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2023Case 31-CA-323372ClosedBurbank, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2023Case 20-CA-322803ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2023Case 32-CA-322816ClosedMerced, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2023Case 10-CA-319513ClosedVinton, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2023Case 10-CA-318600ClosedSalem, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2023Case 10-CA-318435ClosedVinton, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2023Case 31-CA-316955ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2023Case 03-CA-310931ClosedOneonta, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2022Case 16-CA-308819ClosedStafford, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2022Case 01-CA-306198ClosedFairfield, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 93
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2022Case 07-CA-298088ClosedFlint, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 400
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 2 June 2022Case 29-RD-296977ClosedOld Westbury, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 8
Included: Aramark School, LLC Excluded: East Williston School District and Consolidated Commercial Workers of America(CCWA) Local 528
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2022Case 08-CA-293618ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2022Case 08-CA-293166ClosedToledo, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2022Case 04-CA-292186ClosedKutztown University, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 92
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2021Case 19-CA-288310ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2021Case 18-CA-286735ClosedFridley, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2021Case 04-CA-286651ClosedKutztown University, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 92
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2021Case 14-CA-285906ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2021Case 07-CA-283868ClosedFlint, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2021Case 13-CA-280309ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2021Case 18-CA-280076ClosedHibbing, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2021Case 13-CA-279727ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2021Case 19-CA-272947ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2020Case 20-CA-270728ClosedRedding, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2020Case 01-CA-266946ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2020Case 18-CA-263747ClosedLa Crosse, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2020Case 07-CA-259134ClosedFlint, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2020Case 18-CA-254094ClosedMenomonee Falls, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2019Case 25-CA-254008ClosedSouth Bend, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 103
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2019Case 02-CA-253561ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2019Case 06-CA-250537ClosedBeaver, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2019Case 05-CA-248848ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2019Case 07-CA-248637ClosedWarren, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2019Case 07-CA-248587ClosedWarren, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2019Case 27-CA-246325ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2019Case 19-CA-239536ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2019Case 05-CA-238879ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2019Case 13-CA-237064ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2018Case 13-CA-232108ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 November 2018Case 04-RC-230531ClosedScranton, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 175
Included: All full-time and regular part-time cooks, cashiers, food service workers, utility workers, drivers, receivers, and lead employees employed by Aramark at Scranton University food service. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors and all others excluded by law.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2018Case 13-CA-224665ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 100
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 16 May 2018Case 08-CA-220169ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2018Case 10-CA-216665ClosedDurham, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2018Case 10-CA-215816ClosedDurham, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2017Case 04-CA-212258ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2017Case 05-CA-209181ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2017Case 04-CA-204906ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2017Case 16-CA-202612ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2017Case 16-CA-202622ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2017Case 14-CA-196810ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 400
ARAMARK
RC
Filed 31 January 2017Case 01-RC-192181ClosedCRANSTON, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 80
Included: All non-supervisory food service employees in the Employer's Cranston Schools Food Service Program. Excluded: All other classifications, clericals, guards, managers and supervisors defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 December 2016Case 01-CA-189313ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 31 October 2016Case 04-RC-187250ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 43
Included: All Full, Part time and Seasonal employees employed at the Philadelphia Zoo, including cooks, Cashiers, Utility Workers, Concessions Workers, Warehouse Employees, Bar Employees, Baristas, Retail Employees and Catering Employees. Excluded: Office Clericals, Guards and Supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2016Case 02-CA-183296ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 90
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 August 2016Case 06-RC-181887ClosedBeaver, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 17
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Food Service Employees employed by the Employer at Beaver Area School District. Excluded: Guards, Supervisors, and Professional Employees as described by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2016Case 04-CA-180416ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 200
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 19 May 2016Case 16-CA-176571ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2016Case 05-CA-176486ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2016Case 16-CA-175971ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 90
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 4 May 2016Case 16-CA-175578ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 226
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2016Case 27-CA-171873ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2016Case 16-CA-170991ClosedArlington, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 March 2016Case 05-RC-170887ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 31
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees employed by the employer at the Catholic University of America Boiler Plant including Engineers, assistant engineers, HVAC techs and mechanics. Excluded: All clerical employees, all managerial employees, all professional employees and all guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2016Case 04-CA-170923ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2016Case 06-CA-167238ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2016Case 05-CA-167062ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 80
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 18 November 2015Case 09-CA-164442ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2015Case 07-CA-159720ClosedWarren, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2015Case 08-CA-158913ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2015Case 27-CA-158373ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 600
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 29 July 2015Case 09-CA-156994ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2015Case 08-CA-156397ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2015Case 08-CA-156394ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2015Case 32-CA-156139ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2015Case 08-CA-155838ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 500
ARAMARK
UC
Filed 27 May 2015Case 15-UC-152985ClosedNEW ORLEANS, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 35
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees at Aramark Schools Facilities, LLC at New Orleans Public Schools. Excluded: All managers, confidential employees and clerical employees, professional employees, active students of the client or any students employed through a vocational training program, causal employees, temporary employees, supervisors and guards.
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 17 February 2015Case 18-CA-146466ClosedGOLDEN VALLEY, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2015Case 15-CA-146118ClosedNew Orleans, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2015Case 12-CA-145891ClosedHialeah, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 275,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2015Case 15-CA-143839ClosedNew Orleans, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2014Case 05-CA-140880ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2014Case 08-CA-139175ClosedUniversity Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 200
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 21 October 2014Case 02-CA-139204ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2014Case 12-CA-137056ClosedPompano Beach, FLRegion 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2014Case 04-CA-127707ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 100
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 30 January 2014Case 07-CA-121582ClosedFlint, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2014Case 05-CA-121691ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 January 2014Case 04-CA-119934ClosedEast Stroudsburg, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 259,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2013Case 05-CA-114995ClosedWilliamsburg, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 290
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 27 September 2013Case 28-CA-114281ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 185
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 25 September 2013Case 28-CA-114081ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2013Case 14-CA-113872ClosedSpringfield, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2013Case 08-CA-107183ClosedParma, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2013Case 19-CA-104767ClosedFairchild AFB, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 May 2013Case 19-CA-104733ClosedFairchild AFB, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 April 2013Case 19-CA-103158ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2013Case 06-CA-100618ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2013Case 03-CA-100532ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 36
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 7 March 2013Case 16-CA-099875ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 80
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 21 February 2013Case 18-CA-098843ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 10
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 January 2013Case 25-RC-096946ClosedDecatur, ILRegion 25Workers in the unit 8
INCLUDING All full-time and regular part-time skilled Grounds and Reveiving employees for ARAMARK at Millikin University located 1184 West Main Street Decatur, IL 62522-2084 and EXCLUDING Clerical, Professional employees, managers, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2012Case 26-CA-082178ClosedWhite Hall, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 100
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 14 May 2012Case 05-CA-081000ClosedWASHINGTON, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 10 May 2012Case 22-CA-080711ClosedSUCCASUNNA, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 5
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 30 April 2012Case 13-CA-079993ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 17 April 2012Case 05-RC-079038ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 13
Included: All full-time and regular part-time employees employed by the employer engaged in plant operations at the George Washington University Central Utility Plant (Ross Hall) Excluded: All office clerical employees, all professional employees, all managerial employees, all guards and supervisors as defined by the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2012Case 25-CA-076656ClosedEvansville, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 80
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 21 February 2012Case 34-RC-074878ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 8
Included: All full time and regular part-time food service employees including: dishwashers, grill cook, waitresses, cashiers, deli, salad bar, front line servers. Excluded: Supervisors as defined under the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2012Case 06-CA-072686ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2012Case 06-CA-072426ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2012Case 16-CA-072051ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2011Case 06-CA-071315ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2011Case 06-CA-071304ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 13 December 2011Case 06-CA-070622ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 13 December 2011Case 06-CA-070618ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
ARAMARK
CA
Filed 13 December 2011Case 06-CA-070615ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 06-CA-069983ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 06-CA-069976ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 06-CA-069972ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 600

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.