Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Cintas Corporation

113 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 113 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 28, 29, 32 · Albany, GA; Ashland, KY; Atlanta, GA; Beaumont, TX; Bedford Park, IL; Blacklick, OH and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	99
RC	Petition for an election	9
RD	Petition to decertify	4
RM	Petition filed by an employer	1

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2026Case 10-CA-390780OpenPelham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2026Case 07-CA-385293OpenMidland, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2024Case 04-CA-349496ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2023Case 28-CA-332681ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 21 December 2021Case 07-RC-288086ClosedMidland, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 3
Included: Loader/Unloader (411) Excluded: Supervisors, Managers, General Manager and all other inside plant employees
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2018Case 04-CA-221128ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 10
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 11 August 2017Case 21-CA-204201ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2017Case 28-CA-203520ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 150
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 13 April 2017Case 21-CA-196796ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 3 March 2017Case 21-CA-194312ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 23 February 2017Case 21-CA-193681ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 65
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 27 October 2016Case 21-CA-187216ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2016Case 14-CA-185457ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 13
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 8 September 2016Case 21-CA-183828ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 28 July 2016Case 21-CA-181186ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 6 July 2015Case 21-CA-155413ClosedWhittier, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 50
CINTAS CORPORATION
RD
Filed 2 March 2015Case 21-RD-147335ClosedWHITTIER, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 12
INCLUDED: PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES EXCLUDED: ALL OTHER EMPLOYEES AT WORK SITE
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 August 2013Case 32-CA-110761ClosedFREMONT, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2013Case 32-CA-107938ClosedFremont, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 35
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 June 2013Case 21-RC-106432ClosedEL SEGUNDO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 33
Included: All regular full-time Route Sales Rep. Drivers Excluded: All other employees, managerial and administrative employees, office clerical employees, guards, mechanics, fuelers, janitorial workers, utility workers, maintenance workers, technicians, and supervisors as defined by the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2012Case 29-CA-088895ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2012Case 29-CA-079856ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2012Case 17-CA-076766ClosedTulsa, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 70
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 4 January 2012Case 29-RD-071851ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 43
All full-time and regular part-time service sales representatives ("SSRs"), route skippers, shuttle drivers, warehouse loaders and unloaders, and new account installers employed at the Employer's facility located at 12 Harbor Park Drive, Port Washington, New York, excluding all sales representatives, office clerical employees, guards, and service training coordinators, route check-in coordinators, management ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2011Case 29-CA-030855ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2010Case 10-CA-038578ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2010Case 10-CA-038531ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 55
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 August 2010Case 10-RC-015798ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Included: All service representatives, shredding specialists and shredding specialist lead, customer service representatives, schedulers employed at 2715 Peachtree Square, Atlanta, GA 30360 and 85 Howell Avenue, Fairburn, GA 30213. Excluded: All office clerical, professional employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisor employees as defined in the Act.
CINTAS CORPORATION
RC
Filed 20 July 2010Case 10-RC-015795ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 22
Included All production and maintenance employees, including truck drivers and shipping employees Excluded All office clerical, professional, supervisory and guards, as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 March 2010Case 21-RC-021190ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 35
All full time and part time drivers and helpers employed by the employer at 675 32nd St., San Diego CA 92102 Excluded: all production, offcie employees, and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2010Case 29-CA-030064ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 29-CA-030059ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 29-CA-030055ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 29-CA-030049ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2009Case 29-CA-029982ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 80
Petition filed by an employer
RM
Filed 9 October 2009Case 26-RM-000476ClosedFort Smith, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 40
Included: All production and maintenance employees of the Employer, including warehouse employees, at the Fort Smith Facility. Excluded: Administrative, executive and office clerical employees, supervisors, and guards as defined in the National Labor Relations Act as amended.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 July 2009Case 29-RC-011769ClosedPort Washington, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 55
Included: All part time and full time hourly commissioned and shuttle drivers warehousemen and installers employed by clintas corporation at 12 Harbor Park Drive Port washington New York Excluded: All other employees including managerial employees confidential employees and office clerical employees and guards professional employees and supervisors as defined in the act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 June 2009Case 29-RC-011763ClosedHicksville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 55
Included: All part time and full time hourly commissioned and shuttle drivers warehousemen and installers employed by cintas corporation at 12 Harbor Park Drive Port Washington New York Excluded: All other employees including managerial employees confidential employees and office clerical employees and guards professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 April 2009Case 13-CA-045256ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 85
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 17 December 2008Case 17-RD-001781ClosedSaint Joseph, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 13
Included: All service sale representatives Excluded: Supervisors and all other employees.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 April 2008Case 08-RC-016954ClosedPerrysburg, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 42
Included: All full and regular part time Sanis Drivers, F. S. Driversand S. S. R. Drivers. Excluded: S.T.C.'SPlant Employees, all office and clerical personnel, all professional and supervisory personnel as described in act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2008Case 15-CA-018627ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2008Case 15-CA-018584ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2008Case 15-CA-018530ClosedMobile, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2007Case 12-CA-025644ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 22 December 2006Case 17-RD-001750ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 12
All full-time and regular part-time route drivers employed by the Employer at its facility located at 3220 South Leonard Road, St. Joseph, Missouri All office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defind in the Act and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2005Case 20-CA-032758ClosedSouth San Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 45
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 25 July 2005Case 09-CA-042194ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 18
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 1 July 2005Case 04-CA-034345ClosedBranford, CTRegion 04Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2004Case 16-CA-024006ClosedVictoria, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2004Case 16-CA-024005ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2004Case 16-CA-024004ClosedBeaumont, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2004Case 10-CA-035335ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 22 November 2004Case 09-CA-041554ClosedBlacklick, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2004Case 05-CA-032240ClosedYork, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2004Case 05-CA-032239ClosedHanover, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2004Case 05-CA-032238ClosedCumberland, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2004Case 17-CA-022946ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 22
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 4 November 2004Case 09-CA-041514ClosedVandalia, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 4 November 2004Case 09-CA-041513ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2004Case 10-CA-035287ClosedAlbany, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2004Case 30-CA-017034ClosedFranklin, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2004Case 17-CA-022848ClosedNorth Kansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2004Case 21-CA-036451ClosedPico Rivera, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2004Case 17-CA-022817ClosedNorth Kansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2004Case 15-CA-017417ClosedMontgomery, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 154
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2004Case 17-CA-022774ClosedNorth Kansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2004Case 18-CA-017331ClosedEagan, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2004Case 18-CA-017291ClosedEagan, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2004Case 04-CA-034162ClosedSchaumburg, ILRegion 04Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2004Case 18-CA-017288ClosedEagan, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2004Case 04-CA-034163ClosedEagan, MNRegion 04Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2004Case 04-CA-034161ClosedCharlotte, NCRegion 04Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2004Case 03-CA-024716ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2004Case 17-CA-022623ClosedNorth Kansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2004Case 34-CA-010736ClosedBranford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2003Case 17-CA-022484ClosedNorth Kansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2003Case 13-CA-041312ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2003Case 13-CA-041305ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2003Case 13-CA-041259ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2003Case 13-CA-041247ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2003Case 13-CA-041195ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2003Case 06-CA-033545ClosedBridgeville, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 June 2003Case 13-CA-041125ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 13 June 2003Case 09-CA-040310ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 10
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 13 June 2003Case 09-CA-040309ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2003Case 05-CA-031285ClosedChester, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2003Case 13-CA-041063ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 19 May 2003Case 09-CA-040242ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2003Case 13-CA-040994ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2003Case 13-CA-040966ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2003Case 06-CA-033342ClosedMorgantown, WVRegion 06Workers in the unit 10
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 25 February 2003Case 09-CA-040012ClosedGrayson, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 210
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 34-CA-010378ClosedBranford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 34-CA-010377ClosedBranford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 28-CA-018488ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 16-CA-022541ClosedConroe, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 09-CA-039973ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 10
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 09-CA-039972ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 07-CA-045884ClosedMacomb, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 07-CA-045882ClosedWestland, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 06-CA-033229ClosedState College, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 05-CA-031063ClosedChester, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 04-CA-034160ClosedCharlotte, NCRegion 04Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 01-CA-040656ClosedChelmsford, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2002Case 25-CA-028246ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 June 2002Case 19-CA-028085ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 7
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 20 March 2002Case 09-CA-039185ClosedGrayson, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 230
CINTAS CORPORATION
CA
Filed 18 March 2002Case 09-CA-039175ClosedGrayson, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
CINTAS CORPORATION
RC
Filed 14 March 2002Case 09-RC-017640ClosedGrayson, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 230
ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE EMPLOYER AT ITS GRAYSON KY LOCATION EXCLUDED: SALESMEN, OFFICE CLERICAL, GUARDS, PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AND SUPERVISORS AS DEFINED IN THE ACT.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2001Case 26-CA-020100ClosedFort Smith, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2000Case 25-CA-027092ClosedEvansville, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 1999Case 25-CA-026760ClosedEvansville, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 6

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.