Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Cintas

32 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 32 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 05, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20, 28, 31, 32 · Amarillo, TX; Ashland, KY; BOSSIER CITY, LA; Bakersfield, CA; Bedford Park, IL; Bedford, VA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	30
RC	Petition for an election	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2023Case 13-CA-319769ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 130
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 November 2018Case 10-RC-231032ClosedGadsden, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 22
Included: Sales Service Representatives, Assistant Sales Service Representatives and Skippers. Excluded: Office Clerical, Guards and Supervisors as defined by the ACT.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2018Case 18-CA-215286ClosedGreen Bay, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2018Case 31-CA-212962ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2015Case 12-CA-163942ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
CINTAS
CA
Filed 30 March 2015Case 05-CA-149306ClosedLandover, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 40
CINTAS
CA
Filed 25 March 2015Case 05-CA-149038ClosedLandover, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2014Case 15-CA-122539ClosedBOSSIER CITY, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 January 2014Case 15-CA-121596ClosedBossier City, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2013Case 15-CA-117038ClosedBossier City, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2013Case 15-CA-117035ClosedBossier City, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2013Case 15-CA-117034ClosedBossier City, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2009Case 26-CA-023520ClosedFort Smith, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 56
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2008Case 13-CA-044851ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2008Case 13-CA-044820ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
CINTAS
CA
Filed 16 April 2008Case 08-CA-037726ClosedPerrysburg, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 42
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 32-CA-023615ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 20-CA-033680ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 13-CA-044365ClosedSchaumburg, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 62
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2007Case 07-CA-050775ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 12-CA-025543ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 120
CINTAS
CA
Filed 24 August 2007Case 09-CA-043815ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 34-CA-011785ClosedBranford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 28-CA-021476ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 16-CA-025700ClosedAmarillo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 812,320
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 13-CA-044144ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2007Case 11-CA-021624ClosedBedford, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 20
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 11 April 2007Case 01-RC-022108ClosedChelmsford, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 58
Included: 1. SSR Drivers (Uniforms), 2. FS-SSR Drivers (Mats, Rugs, Linnen), 3. SANIS Drivers (Restoration - Kitchen and Bathrooms) Excluded: All other (Managers)
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2006Case 28-CA-020941ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 33
CINTAS
CA
Filed 25 January 2006Case 09-CA-042598ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 20-CA-031070ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 22,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2003Case 20-CA-031069ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 22,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.