Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

First Transit

226 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 226 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · ANAHEIM, CA; Anaheim, CA; Annapolis, MD; Atlanta, GA; Auburn, AL; Austin, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	199
RC	Petition for an election	22
RD	Petition to decertify	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2024Case 10-CA-338898ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 February 2024Case 18-RC-336823ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 4
Included: All full-time and part-time Schedulers to be added to current bargaining unit.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2023Case 28-CA-325015ClosedTempe, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 51
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2023Case 31-CA-317692ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2023Case 31-CA-317638ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 22
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2022Case 14-CA-307602ClosedLawrence, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 135
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 21 November 2022Case 05-RC-307496ClosedGlen Burnie, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 4
Included: All full-time and regular part-time dispatchers and road supervisors employed at or out of the Employer’s facilities in Annapolis and Glen Burnie, Maryland. The Union seeks an Armour-Globe election. Excluded: All other employees, guards, and supervisors under the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2022Case 10-CA-299211ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2022Case 10-CA-296966ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2022Case 31-CA-296440ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2022Case 10-CA-294305ClosedAuburn, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2022Case 16-CA-293966ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2022Case 10-CA-293543ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2022Case 10-CA-288821ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2021Case 16-CA-285849ClosedBeaumont, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 44
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2021Case 31-CA-285440ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2021Case 10-CA-284874ClosedMarietta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2021Case 31-CA-281570ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2021Case 31-CA-280796ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2021Case 31-CA-280628ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2021Case 31-CA-280626ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2021Case 31-CA-280621ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2021Case 31-CA-278823ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2021Case 31-CA-278772ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2021Case 32-CA-277565ClosedMerced, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2021Case 05-CA-276533ClosedWoodbridge, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2021Case 31-CA-276379ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2021Case 31-CA-276376ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 23
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 19 April 2021Case 21-RD-275777ClosedEL CENTRO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 17
Included: All full-time and regular part-time dispatchers and office clerks employed by the Employer at its facility currently located at 792 East Ross Avenue, El Centro, California; Excluded: All other employees, employees represented in other bargaining units, professional employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2021Case 06-CA-272865ClosedHouston, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2021Case 06-CA-271392ClosedHouston, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 64
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2020Case 10-CA-269972ClosedMarietta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2020Case 06-CA-267808ClosedHouston, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2020Case 05-CA-262355ClosedGlen Burnie, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2020Case 05-CA-260871ClosedGlen Burnie, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 May 2020Case 05-CA-260833ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2020Case 05-CA-260404ClosedAnnapolis, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2020Case 10-CA-255163ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2020Case 25-CA-254707ClosedMuncie, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 50
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 20 December 2019Case 09-CA-253728ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 160
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 19 December 2019Case 09-CA-253578ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 160
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 6 December 2019Case 09-CA-252989ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 140
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 21 November 2019Case 09-CA-252260ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 3 October 2019Case 09-CA-249326ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 30 September 2019Case 09-CA-249074ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 150
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 16 July 2019Case 09-CA-245016ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2019Case 01-CA-244764ClosedEast Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2019Case 05-CA-240038ClosedSilver Spring, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2019Case 03-CA-235514ClosedCuba, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2019Case 10-CA-233619ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 66
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 15 October 2018Case 21-CA-229278ClosedANAHEIM, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2018Case 12-CA-227151ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2018Case 05-CA-220594ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 300
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 14 May 2018Case 21-CA-220348ClosedANAHEIM, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 16 April 2018Case 21-CA-218508ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 31 January 2018Case 21-CA-214066ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 18-CA-210578ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 700
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 23 August 2017Case 01-CA-204981ClosedNashua, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2017Case 32-CA-201105ClosedReno, NVRegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2017Case 10-CA-199178ClosedKennesaw, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2017Case 10-CA-196138ClosedKnoxville, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 30
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 30 March 2017Case 09-CA-196003ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2017Case 03-CA-195310ClosedGetzville, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2017Case 10-CA-193518ClosedKennesaw, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 28 November 2016Case 06-RC-188861ClosedPittsburgh, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1
Included: Call Taker.
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 18 November 2016Case 18-CA-188418ClosedRoseville, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 400
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 15 November 2016Case 18-CA-188166ClosedMinneapolis, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 700
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 11 October 2016Case 22-CA-186086ClosedFlemington, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2016Case 05-CA-185885ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2016Case 12-CA-184762ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2016Case 12-CA-180387ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2016Case 15-CA-173709ClosedJackson, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 March 2016Case 03-RC-171755ClosedCuba, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 40
Included: Full-Time and Regular Part-Time Drivers, Full-Time and Regular Part-Time Mechanics who perform work for the Company at its facilities located in Cuba, NY, Wellsville, NY and Steamburg, NY Excluded: All office and clerical employees, dispatchers, guards, supervisors as defined in the Act and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2015Case 05-CA-165939ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2015Case 12-CA-164696ClosedBoynton Beach, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2015Case 13-CA-164643ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2015Case 05-CA-161691ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 2015Case 12-CA-158333ClosedCarolina, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2015Case 05-CA-157347ClosedCapitol Heights, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 302
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2015Case 32-CA-155765ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2015Case 16-CA-150806ClosedHOUSTON, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2015Case 16-CA-150802ClosedHOUSTON, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 450
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 20 April 2015Case 21-CA-150562ClosedPOMONA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 12
FIRST TRANSIT
RC
Filed 23 February 2015Case 21-RC-146847ClosedPOMONA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 12
Included: All full time and part time road supervisors and disptachers excluded: Office clerical, maintance employees, professional employees, confidential employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 17 November 2014Case 20-RC-141009ClosedRedwood City, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 17
Dispatchers, Road Supervisors, Supervisors, Payroll
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 14 November 2014Case 21-CA-140952ClosedEL MONTE, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2014Case 10-CA-139887ClosedConcord, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 22 August 2014Case 32-CA-138421ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2014Case 05-CA-134919ClosedElkridge, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2014Case 13-CA-131188ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 24
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 7 May 2014Case 22-CA-128195ClosedHAMILTON, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2014Case 12-CA-126068ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 March 2014Case 12-CA-124631ClosedSAN JUAN, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2014Case 05-CA-122631ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 31 January 2014Case 12-CA-121597ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 December 2013Case 05-CA-118707ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2013Case 19-CA-114363ClosedLAKEWOOD, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2013Case 05-CA-113132ClosedCapitol Heights, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2013Case 15-CA-112919ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2013Case 01-CA-112278ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 July 2013Case 02-CA-108580ClosedCarmel, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2013Case 31-CA-107840ClosedSan Bernardino, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2013Case 31-CA-106092ClosedSan Bernardino, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 19 April 2013Case 01-CA-103284ClosedFramingham, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2013Case 05-CA-101113ClosedLinthicum Heights, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 120
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 22 March 2013Case 03-RD-100925ClosedPlattsburgh, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 55
Drivers and Bus Monitors Excluded: Guard, Supervisor
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2013Case 28-CA-097554ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2013Case 05-CA-095764ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2012Case 05-CA-093694ClosedWoodbridge, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 180
FIRST TRANSIT
RD
Filed 16 November 2012Case 18-RD-093359ClosedRoseville, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 17
Maintenance Shop and Utility Dept
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2012Case 05-CA-092426ClosedWoodbridge, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2012Case 05-CA-088592ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2012Case 05-CA-088583ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2012Case 28-CA-087533ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2012Case 28-CA-087423ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 31 July 2012Case 17-RC-086269ClosedKansas City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 21
All full-time and regular part-time drivers and utility worker employed from thejEmployer's facility located at 8400 East 13th Terrace, Kansas City, Missouri, but EXCLUDING all office and clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2012Case 34-CA-084085ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2012Case 05-CA-076294ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2012Case 05-CA-076329ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2012Case 34-CA-074380ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 January 2012Case 34-CA-072698ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2011Case 34-CA-070849ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2011Case 13-CA-070271ClosedHammond, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2011Case 05-CA-069568ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2011Case 34-CA-068897ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2011Case 24-CA-068129ClosedPuerto Nuevo, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2011Case 34-CA-067205ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2011Case 34-CA-064670ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2011Case 22-CA-062459ClosedUNION, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2011Case 05-CA-062109ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2011Case 24-CA-061729ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2011Case 16-CA-028127ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2011Case 28-CA-060616ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 May 2011Case 28-RC-006771ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 9
Included: All full-time and regular part-time clerical employees employed by the Company at its facilities located at 3214 Citizen Ave., North Las Vegas, Nevada 89032. Excluded: All other employees including guards, managers, professional employees, and supervisors, as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2011Case 05-CA-036606ClosedWoodbridge, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2011Case 34-CA-012980ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 March 2011Case 17-CA-025104ClosedSaint Joseph, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2011Case 11-CA-023018ClosedRaleigh, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 48
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 February 2011Case 34-CA-012910ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2011Case 28-CA-023325ClosedNorth Las vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2010Case 34-CA-012832ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2010Case 29-CA-030468ClosedLong Island City, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 780
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2010Case 34-CA-012810ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2010Case 13-CA-046302ClosedHammond, INRegion 13Workers in the unit 41
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 29 July 2010Case 22-RC-013143ClosedUnion, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 13
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2010Case 05-CA-036001ClosedForestville, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 140
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2010Case 22-CA-029539ClosedCarlstadt, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 3
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 22 April 2010Case 03-UC-000538ClosedElmira, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 31
Included: All full-time and part-time Bus Aides to be included with existing unit of all drivers employed by First Transit Inc. engaged in the operation of Chemung County Transit Buses Excluded: Confidential employees, managerial employees, guards, supervisors as defined in the National Labor Relations Act, and the employees in the Driver's unit currently represented by the Union.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2010Case 34-CA-012653ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2010Case 15-CA-019494ClosedBaton Rouge, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 10

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.