Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

First Transit

226 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 226 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · ANAHEIM, CA; Anaheim, CA; Annapolis, MD; Atlanta, GA; Auburn, AL; Austin, TX and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	199
RC	Petition for an election	22
RD	Petition to decertify	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	1

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 February 2010Case 28-RC-006709ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 410
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Drivers, Mechanics, Utility Workers and Tire Workers employed by the Employer at its North Las Vegas Paratransit operations located at 3214 Citizen Avenue, North Las Vegas, Nevada. Excluded: All other employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2010Case 15-CA-019431ClosedBaton Rouge, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2010Case 05-CA-035558ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 115
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 34-CA-012581ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2010Case 27-CA-021463ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2010Case 24-CA-011428ClosedPuerto Nuevo, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2009Case 25-CA-031247ClosedMuncie, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2009Case 25-CA-031240ClosedMuncie, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 70
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 December 2009Case 04-RC-021629ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 200
All Full and Part Time Drivers, Machine Operators and Mechanics.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2009Case 24-CA-011410ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2009Case 27-CA-021431ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2009Case 16-CA-027156ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 25
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 3 November 2009Case 25-CA-031189ClosedMuncie, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 70
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2009Case 10-CA-038121ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
FIRST TRANSIT
RC
Filed 6 October 2009Case 10-RC-015767ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 8
Included All full and regular part-time driver employed by the employer servicing its Grady Memorial Hospital and Savannah College of Arts and Design (Atlanta campus) accounts Excluded All other employees, guards, dispatchers, professional and clerical employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act
FIRST TRANSIT
RC
Filed 24 September 2009Case 10-RC-015765ClosedSavannah, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 40
Included All full time and regular part-time drivers employed by the employer at its Savannah College of Arts and Design (SCAD) location Excluded All other employees, office clerical employees, professional employees, dispatchers, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2009Case 05-CA-035279ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 115
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2009Case 28-CA-022694ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2009Case 30-CA-018438ClosedMilwaukee, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2009Case 15-CA-019256ClosedMonroe, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 45
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2009Case 24-CA-011304ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 29-CA-029793ClosedLong Island City, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 19-CA-032053ClosedEverett, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 19-CA-032052ClosedLakewood, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2009Case 08-CA-038451ClosedSheffield, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2009Case 05-CA-035118ClosedLaurel, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2009Case 10-CA-037966ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 81
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2009Case 10-CA-037941ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2009Case 09-CA-045002ClosedXenia, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 37
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 June 2009Case 34-RC-002321ClosedEast Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 6
Included: All full-time and regular part-time reservationists employed by the Employer at ist East Hartford facility. Excluded: Guards, supervisors and professional employees as specified in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2009Case 34-CA-012374ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2009Case 03-CA-027193ClosedHartford, CTRegion 03Workers in the unit 150
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 June 2009Case 27-RC-008560ClosedNampa, IDRegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Included: All Part time and Full Time Bus Drivers, Service Techs, Mechanics. Excluded: All Office and Clerical Management and Supervisors as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 June 2009Case 16-RC-010890ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 81
INCLUDED: All part-time and full-time Drivers, Trainers, Aides or Monitors. EXCLUDED: All supervisors, managers, dispatchers, mechanics, clerical workers and security as defined in the Act thereof.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2009Case 10-CA-037909ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 81
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2009Case 27-CA-021231ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2009Case 28-CA-022471ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 9 April 2009Case 10-RC-015745ClosedTuscaloosa, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 50
Included: All regular Full-time and Part-time Operations also known as Bus Drivers Excluded: All other employees including Managers and Supervisors
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 28-CA-022431ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2009Case 34-CA-012299ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2009Case 34-CA-012298ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2008Case 34-CA-012222ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 18 November 2008Case 21-RC-021095ClosedEl Cajon, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 10
Included: Clerical employees to include all telephone operators, reservation takers/makers, receptionists, clerks and all other non-excluded office employees. Excluded: All management personnel with supervisory authority to hire, fire or discipline employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2008Case 27-CA-020969ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2008Case 27-CA-020964ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2008Case 05-CA-034420ClosedLaurel, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 July 2008Case 34-CA-012089ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2008Case 05-CA-034395ClosedFriendship, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2008Case 10-CA-037425ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2008Case 28-CA-021964ClosedNorth Las Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 15
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 May 2008Case 10-RC-015695ClosedStatesboro, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 20
All Full-time and regular Part-time Drivers, Fuelers and Office Clericals employed by the Employer at its GA Southern University account; but excluding all Managers, Supervisors and Guards.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2008Case 25-CA-030680ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 25Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2008Case 21-CA-038330ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 120
FIRST TRANSIT
RC
Filed 19 February 2008Case 03-RC-011806ClosedRochester, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 24
Included : All full time and part time school bus operators, mechanics and bus washers employed by the company at its 600 West Avenue, Rochester, New York Location. Excluded: Excluding all office clerical employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2008Case 34-CA-011942ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 October 2007Case 03-RC-011783ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 63
All full-time and part-time drivers and mechanics. Excluded: Supervisors
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 23 July 2007Case 09-CA-043723ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 62
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2007Case 05-CA-033592ClosedFriendship, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2007Case 05-CA-033583ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 200
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 29 March 2007Case 09-CA-043521ClosedErlanger, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 20
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 10 January 2007Case 09-CA-043382ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 24 November 2006Case 09-CA-043276ClosedXenia, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2006Case 16-CA-025315ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 17 November 2006Case 09-CA-043263ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 80
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 09-CA-043242ClosedXenia, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 40
FIRST TRANSIT
CA
Filed 25 September 2006Case 09-CA-043129ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2006Case 27-CA-020180ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2006Case 05-CA-033185ClosedWoodbridge, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2006Case 11-CA-021150ClosedSpartanburg, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2006Case 27-CA-019954ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2006Case 27-CA-019949ClosedLongmont, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 December 2005Case 27-CA-019865ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 360
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 4 November 2005Case 03-RC-011671ClosedHorseheads, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 2
All full-time and part-time drivers for Department of Correction Inmate Movement, Plattsburgh location. Excluded: All supervisors and all others as defined under the act.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 21 September 2005Case 27-RD-001176ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 360
Included: All full-time and part-time bus drivers employed by the company at its Denver and Longmont locations. Excluded: All office clerical employees, maintenance employees, dispatchers, managers, gurads and supervisors as dfeined by the NLR Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 August 2005Case 16-CA-024437ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2004Case 16-CA-024030ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 450

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.