Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Kaiser Permanente

650 cases in this site's copy of the record · 22 of those 650 are marked open by the Board · Region 04, 05, 07, 08, 10, 14, 19, 20, 21, 27, 31, 32 · ANAHEIM, CA; Alameda, CA; Anaheim, CA; Antioch, CA; Atlanta, GA; Aurora, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	633
RC	Petition for an election	13
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Page 4 of 5, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2011Case 31-CA-062424ClosedLOS ANGELES, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2011Case 32-CA-025794ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2011Case 27-CA-021915ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 June 2011Case 32-RC-005826ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,806
All employees covered by the current collective bargaining agreement between the Petitioner and the Employer; specifically, all office and clerical employees of the Employer but excluding confidential and supervisory employees as defined by the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended, and other employees mutually agreed upon by the parties, at the following locations and thier environs or future satellite ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2011Case 36-CA-010859ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 167,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2011Case 31-CA-030213ClosedFontana, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2011Case 36-CA-010840ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 167,300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 April 2011Case 32-RC-005819ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,801
Included: All employees covered by the current collective bargaining agreement between the Petitioner and the Employer (see above Present Unit), and all Fleet Specialists employed at 1950 Franklin Street, Oakland, California. Excluded: all other employees, guards, and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2011Case 05-CA-036556ClosedSilver Spring, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2011Case 20-CA-035521ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2011Case 20-CA-035463ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2011Case 37-CA-008273ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2011Case 37-CA-008269ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2011Case 37-CA-008267ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2011Case 32-CA-025590ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2011Case 32-CA-025586ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 February 2011Case 27-RC-008635ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 22
Included: All building Engineering Employees, Including lead employees, employed by the employer at vairous health care facilities job sites. Excluded: Excluding all {Professional Clerical Confidential Employees, Guards and Supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2011Case 04-CA-037902ClosedWynnewood, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2011Case 20-CA-035372ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 December 2010Case 31-CA-030075ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 December 2010Case 32-CA-025517ClosedManteca, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2010Case 32-CA-025472ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2010Case 32-CA-025448ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2010Case 32-CA-025390ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2010Case 20-CA-035313ClosedOakland, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2010Case 21-CA-039521ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2010Case 20-CA-035277ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2010Case 32-CA-025355ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2010Case 32-CA-025354ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2010Case 32-CA-025353ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2010Case 20-CA-035246ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 August 2010Case 20-CA-035236ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2010Case 31-CA-029897ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2010Case 20-CA-035233ClosedVallejo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2010Case 20-CA-035232ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2010Case 20-CA-035231ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 32-CA-025313ClosedPleasanton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 32-CA-025312ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 20-CA-035229ClosedOakland, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2010Case 32-CA-025311ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2010Case 32-CA-025310ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2010Case 32-CA-025258ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2010Case 32-CA-025220ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2010Case 32-CA-025214ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2010Case 20-CA-035167ClosedRedwood City, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 July 2010Case 32-CA-025200ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,092
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 31-CA-029796ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 20-CA-035129ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 08-CA-039002ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2010Case 20-CA-035107ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2010Case 32-CA-025153ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2010Case 20-CA-035087ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 622,110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2010Case 32-CA-025146ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2010Case 20-CA-035069ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2010Case 31-CA-029756ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 June 2010Case 20-CA-035065ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2010Case 32-CA-025133ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2010Case 32-CA-025128ClosedAntioch, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 32-CA-025107ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 20-CA-035034ClosedRedwood City, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2010Case 31-CA-029724ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2010Case 20-CA-035024ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2010Case 05-CA-035802ClosedFairfax, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2010Case 05-CA-035801ClosedFairfax, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2010Case 32-CA-025083ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2010Case 20-CA-035015ClosedVallejo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2010Case 20-CA-034985ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2010Case 32-CA-025029ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2010Case 31-CA-029651ClosedPanorama City, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2010Case 32-CA-025007ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2010Case 32-CA-025001ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 190
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2010Case 20-CA-034933ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2010Case 32-CA-024975ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2010Case 32-CA-024974ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2010Case 20-CA-034900ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 20-CA-034892ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2010Case 36-CA-010605ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 January 2010Case 21-CA-039197ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 3,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2010Case 31-CA-029563ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2010Case 31-CA-029562ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2010Case 31-CA-029556ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 3
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2009Case 08-CA-038716ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2009Case 20-CA-034815ClosedSouth Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 52
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2009Case 36-CA-010579ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 9,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2009Case 27-CA-021415ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2009Case 20-CA-034722ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 21-CA-039066ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2009Case 32-CA-024786ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2009Case 31-CA-029454ClosedWoodland Hills, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 21 September 2009Case 27-RC-008574ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Included: All building engineers, including lead employees, employed byt he employer at various Health Care Facilities. Excluded: All professional, clerical, confidential employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2009Case 20-CA-034664ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2009Case 20-CA-034659ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2009Case 32-CA-024703ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 52
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 20-CA-034642ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2009Case 20-CA-034602ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2009Case 10-CA-037981ClosedDuluth, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2009Case 20-CA-034574ClosedVallejo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2009Case 10-CA-037955ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2009Case 31-CA-029303ClosedFontana, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2009Case 32-CA-024580ClosedFresno, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 20-CA-034524ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2009Case 20-CA-034492ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2009Case 32-CA-024518ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2009Case 14-CA-029744ClosedOakland, CARegion 14Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 April 2009Case 20-CA-034463ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 20-CA-034459ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 April 2009Case 21-CA-038817ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2009Case 32-CA-024488ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2009Case 20-CA-034435ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2009Case 10-CA-037802ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2009Case 21-CA-038803ClosedBellflower, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2009Case 20-CA-034420ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 20-CA-034392ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2009Case 32-CA-024388ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 31-CA-029117ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 2,400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 February 2009Case 31-RC-008745ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 950
Included: All employees covered by collective bargaining agreement including all In-Patient Registered Nurses, all Home Health and Hospice Registered Nurses including Level II Hospital, Level II Stepdown, Level III Specialty Unit, Level III Charge and PHN. Exluded: All office Clerical Employees, guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2009Case 31-CA-029109ClosedBurbank, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2009Case 21-CA-038877ClosedBurbank, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2009Case 07-CA-051960ClosedBurbank, CARegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 February 2009Case 32-RC-005645ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 43,000
Included: All employees described in the current (or expired) collective bargaining agreement. Excluded: All other employees.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 February 2009Case 32-RC-005644ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 350
Included: All employees covered by collective bargaining agreement including Benchpersons, Optical Dispensers, Surface Grinders, Prescription Stock Clerks, Inspectors, Utility Optical workers, Optical Services Assistants, Working Foremen, Lead Optical Dispensers, Lead Prescription Stock Clerks and Special Optical workers, Contact Lense Assistants, Contact Lenses Trainees, Contact Lens Fitters, and Optical Equipment ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 February 2009Case 32-RC-005643ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 350
Included: All employees covered by collective bargaining agreement including all Medical Social Workers employed by the Employer in covered positions including Medical Social Worker I and Medical Social Worker II. Excluded: A Medical Social Worker assigned to be Director of Social Services at any of the Employer's facilities or to who the Employer has given authority to promote, discipline, discharge, or otherwise ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 February 2009Case 32-RC-005642ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,200
Included: All employees covered by collective bargaining agreement including all non-supervisory staff Newropsychologists, Psychologists, Licensed Clinical Social Workers, Marriage and Family Therapists and Chemical Dependency Counselors I & II, Unlicensed Case Managers, Psychiatric Social Worker Assistants, Marriage and Family Therapist Assistants, and Psychological Assistants who perform clinical work and provide ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2009Case 20-CA-034330ClosedDavis, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2009Case 20-CA-034325ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2009Case 37-CA-007702ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2008Case 32-CA-024277ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,423
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2008Case 32-CA-024273ClosedBerkeley, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2008Case 27-CA-021101ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2008Case 32-CA-024225ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2008Case 37-CA-007653ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2008Case 21-CA-038525ClosedDowney, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2008Case 21-CA-038517ClosedBellflower, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2008Case 37-CA-007635ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2008Case 32-CA-024081ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2008Case 37-CA-007629ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2008Case 20-CA-034046ClosedRoseville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2008Case 10-CA-037451ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2008Case 10-CA-037430ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2008Case 20-CA-033989ClosedFairfield, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2008Case 32-CA-023923ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2008Case 21-CA-038342ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2008Case 32-CA-023838ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 31 March 2008Case 36-RC-006411ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 30
All employees working at Kaiser Permanente NW as staffers (Staffing, Staffing Specialist, Out Patient Staffing/Specialist, MIS/Staffing) excluding supervisors and guards.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 March 2008Case 27-RC-008518ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Included: All Building Enginerring Employees, including lead employees, employed by the employer at various HealthCare Facilities job sites. Excluded: Excluding all Professional, Clerical, Confidential Employees, Guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2008Case 27-CA-020792ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 December 2007Case 27-CA-020707ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2007Case 32-CA-023638ClosedFresno, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2007Case 31-CA-028581ClosedWoodland Hills, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 37-CA-007453ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,500

Page 4 of 5, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.