Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Kaiser Permanente

651 cases in this site's copy of the record · 23 of those 651 are marked open by the Board · Region 04, 05, 07, 08, 10, 14, 19, 20, 21, 27, 31, 32 · ANAHEIM, CA; Alameda, CA; Anaheim, CA; Antioch, CA; Atlanta, GA; Aurora, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

This name is gathered, along with others, on the Kaiser Permanente page.

The Board has also spelled this name Kaiser Permanente, Inc. (1). Every spelling of this name.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	634
RC	Petition for an election	13
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Page 5 of 5, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 37-CA-007453ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 4,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2007Case 37-CA-007435ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 21-CA-037998ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 21-CA-037997ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 21-CA-037996ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2007Case 21-CA-037995ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2007Case 20-CA-033543ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2007Case 31-CA-028380ClosedFontana, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2007Case 21-CA-037843ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2007Case 27-CA-020522ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2007Case 21-CA-037841ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2007Case 21-CA-037839ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2007Case 21-CA-037838ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2007Case 32-CA-023288ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2007Case 05-CA-033625ClosedRockville, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2007Case 21-CA-037793ClosedPasadena, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 750
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2007Case 37-CA-007367ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 May 2007Case 27-CA-020476ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 21
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 March 2007Case 27-RC-008483ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 22
Included: All building Engineering Employees, including lead employees, employed by the employer at varius Health Care Facilities job sites. Excluded: Excluding all Professional, Clerical, Confidential Employees, Guards, and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2007Case 20-CA-033311ClosedVallejo, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2007Case 20-CA-033310ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2007Case 08-CA-037027ClosedParma, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 21-CA-037654ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2007Case 32-CA-023039ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2007Case 32-CA-023037ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2007Case 20-CA-033263ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2007Case 32-CA-023001ClosedUnion City, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2006Case 31-CA-027989ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2006Case 20-CA-033030ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2006Case 20-CA-033022ClosedFairfield, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2006Case 20-CA-033012ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2006Case 27-CA-019969ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2005Case 20-CA-032808ClosedSanta Rosa, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 13,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2005Case 36-CA-009842ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2005Case 27-CA-019783ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2005Case 27-CA-019715ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2005Case 20-CA-032389ClosedVacaville, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2004Case 32-CA-021591ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2004Case 21-CA-036284ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2004Case 27-CA-018992ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,100
KAISER PERMANENTE
CA
Filed 28 February 2003Case 31-CA-026171ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2002Case 32-CA-020126ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2001Case 37-CA-005882ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2000Case 31-CA-024305ClosedNorth Hollywood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 50,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 August 1999Case 32-CA-017637ClosedBerkeley, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 1,000
KAISER PERMANENTE
CA
Filed 22 February 1999Case 21-CA-033194ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 1999Case 20-CA-028919ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 December 1998Case 32-CA-017174ClosedOakland, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 1998Case 20-CA-028275ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 1997Case 20-CA-027945ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 1996Case 20-CA-027176ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100

Page 5 of 5, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5

Last refreshed 22 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.