Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

King Soopers

71 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 71 are marked open by the Board · Region 27 · Aurora, CO; Broomfield, CO; Castle Rock, CO; Centennial, CO; Colorado Springs, CO; Denver, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	64
RC	Petition for an election	7

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2026Case 27-CA-390720OpenDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2025Case 27-CA-366121ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2025Case 27-CA-360708OpenDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2023Case 27-CA-312760ClosedGlendale, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2022Case 27-CA-309005ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 July 2022Case 27-CA-300029ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2022Case 27-CA-295852ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2022Case 27-CA-289008ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2022Case 27-CA-289001ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2021Case 27-CA-288295ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2021Case 27-CA-288292ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2021Case 27-CA-288090ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2021Case 27-CA-288085ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2021Case 27-CA-288081ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2021Case 27-CA-271228ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2021Case 27-CA-271224ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2020Case 27-CA-270607ClosedCastle Rock, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 175
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2020Case 27-CA-261143ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 April 2020Case 27-CA-259464ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2020Case 27-CA-258986ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2019Case 27-CA-237389ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2019Case 27-CA-237196ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2019Case 27-CA-237189ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2019Case 27-CA-237104ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2019Case 27-CA-237077ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 12,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2019Case 27-CA-235752ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2019Case 27-CA-234586ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2018Case 27-CA-231734ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 26 November 2018Case 27-RC-231572ClosedThornton, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5
Included: All Pharmacy Technicians in self-determination election to determine whether they will be represented by Petitioner and join the existing Denver retail bargaining unit represented by the Petitioner (Armour-Globe election) Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other employees, supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2018Case 27-CA-217561ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 14 February 2018Case 27-RC-214859ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 11
Included: All employees in the Deli department in self-determination election to determine whether they will be represented by Petitioner and join the existing bargaining unit in the store represented by the Petitioner (Armour-Globe election). Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined in the Act
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 13 December 2017Case 27-RC-211524ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Included: All employees in the Deli department in self-determination election to determine whether they will be represented by Petitioner and join the existing bargaining unit in the store represented by the Petitioner (Armour-Globe election) Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees defined in the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2017Case 27-CA-210608ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 October 2017Case 27-RC-208966ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 8
Included: All employees in the Deli department Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 October 2017Case 27-RC-208566ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 8
Included: All employees in the Deli department Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2016Case 27-CA-176372ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2016Case 27-CA-175456ClosedCentennial, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2016Case 27-CA-169916ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 15 January 2016Case 27-RC-167715ClosedGreeley, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 23
Included: All deli, coffee and cheese department employees at KS store #11. Excluded: All other employees, store managers, watchmen, guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined by the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2014Case 27-CA-135627ClosedPueblo, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2014Case 27-CA-129102ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 April 2014Case 27-CA-125906ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2014Case 27-CA-125841ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2014Case 27-CA-122003ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2013Case 27-CA-119446ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 November 2013Case 27-CA-118040ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2013Case 27-CA-117104ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2013Case 27-CA-115662ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2013Case 27-CA-115661ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114910ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2013Case 27-CA-112993ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2013Case 27-CA-107519ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 May 2013Case 27-RC-104452ClosedLafayette, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 107
INCLUDED: All employees actively engaged in the handling and selling of merchandize, including part-time workers who whork regularly one (1) day or more a week, employed by Employer in the grocery fstore or stores owned or operated by the Employer at 480 U.S. Highway 289, LaFayette, CO 80026, specifically including the Starbucks Department. EXCLUDED: All store managers, first assistant managers, associate managers, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2013Case 27-CA-097024ClosedFirestone, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2013Case 27-CA-096537ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2012Case 27-CA-081666ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2011Case 27-CA-021883ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2011Case 27-CA-021881ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2011Case 27-CA-021878ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2011Case 27-CA-021877ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2011Case 27-CA-021876ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2011Case 27-CA-021843ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2011Case 27-CA-021842ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2011Case 27-CA-021841ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2010Case 27-CA-021572ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2008Case 27-CA-020827ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2007Case 27-CA-020686ClosedLakewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2007Case 27-CA-020616ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2006Case 27-CA-019943ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2002Case 27-CA-018174ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2002Case 27-CA-017933ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 15,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.