Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

King Soopers, Inc.

199 cases in this site's copy of the record · 3 of those 199 are marked open by the Board · Region 27 · Aurora, CO; Bennett, CO; Broomfield, CO; Castle Rock, CO; Centennial, CO; Colorado Springs, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	193
RC	Petition for an election	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2026Case 27-CA-393731OpenAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2026Case 27-CA-390537OpenDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2025Case 27-CA-361343ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2025Case 27-CA-358859ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2025Case 27-CA-358843ClosedWheat Ridge, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 January 2025Case 27-CA-358726ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2024Case 27-CA-356031ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2024Case 27-CA-355959ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 July 2024Case 27-CA-346949ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2024Case 27-CA-342238ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2023Case 27-CA-328151ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2023Case 27-CA-326456OpenWheat Ridge, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2020Case 27-CA-266090ClosedBennett, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2020Case 27-CA-261062ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2020Case 27-CA-260263ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2020Case 27-CA-257761ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2018Case 27-CA-223572ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 June 2018Case 27-RC-221531ClosedConifer, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 24
Included: All employees in the Meat, Seafood, Deli and Starbucks departments Excluded: Store Manager, Asst. Store Manager, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined by the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 March 2018Case 27-RC-215705ClosedBroomfield, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 11
Involved: All employees in the Deli department in self-determination election to determine whether they will be represented by Petitioner and join the existing bargaining unit in the store represented by the Petitioner (Armour-Globe election) Excluded: Store Director, Asst. Store Director, all other supervisors, security, confidential, professional, and all temporary employees as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2016Case 27-CA-188011ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 September 2016Case 27-CA-183772ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2015Case 27-CA-162930ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 July 2015Case 27-CA-156921ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2015Case 27-CA-150190ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2015Case 27-CA-148541ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
KING SOOPERS, INC.
CA
Filed 25 November 2014Case 27-CA-141652ClosedDENVER, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2014Case 27-CA-139608ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
KING SOOPERS, INC.
CA
Filed 3 July 2014Case 27-CA-132129ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2014Case 27-CA-131766ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2014Case 27-CA-129598ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2014Case 27-CA-129263ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2014Case 27-CA-129286ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2014Case 27-CA-129212ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2014Case 27-CA-128254ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2014Case 27-CA-126340ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2014Case 27-CA-126102ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2014Case 27-CA-125359ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2014Case 27-CA-125358ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2014Case 27-CA-121540ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2014Case 27-CA-120040ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2013Case 27-CA-119540ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2013Case 27-CA-118611ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2013Case 27-CA-117931ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2013Case 27-CA-117279ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2013Case 27-CA-116851ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2013Case 27-CA-116559ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2013Case 27-CA-116429ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2013Case 27-CA-115990ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2013Case 27-CA-115771ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2013Case 27-CA-115747ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2013Case 27-CA-115568ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2013Case 27-CA-115429ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2013Case 27-CA-115406ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114987ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114984ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114981ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114980ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2013Case 27-CA-114976ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2013Case 27-CA-114454ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2013Case 27-CA-114308ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2013Case 27-CA-114210ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2013Case 27-CA-114183ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2013Case 27-CA-114099ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2013Case 27-CA-113529ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2013Case 27-CA-113357ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 September 2013Case 27-CA-113302ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2013Case 27-CA-113106ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 September 2013Case 27-CA-113019ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2013Case 27-CA-112854ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 September 2013Case 27-CA-112795ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2013Case 27-CA-112677ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2013Case 27-CA-112558ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2013Case 27-CA-112389ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 August 2013Case 27-CA-112302ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2013Case 27-CA-112223ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2013Case 27-CA-112151ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2013Case 27-CA-111981ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2013Case 27-CA-111911ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2013Case 27-CA-111907ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2013Case 27-CA-111823ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 27-CA-111751ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
KING SOOPERS, INC.
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 27-CA-111731ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2013Case 27-CA-111699ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2013Case 27-CA-111505ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2013Case 27-CA-111521ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2013Case 27-CA-111339ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 August 2013Case 27-CA-111318ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2013Case 27-CA-111311ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2013Case 27-CA-111160ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2013Case 27-CA-110353ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2013Case 27-CA-110162ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2013Case 27-CA-108044ClosedLafayette, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2013Case 27-CA-106647ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 50
KING SOOPERS, INC.
CA
Filed 23 May 2013Case 27-CA-105907ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2013Case 27-CA-098178ClosedFirestone, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2013Case 27-CA-095761ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2012Case 27-CA-089511ClosedCentennial, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2012Case 27-CA-086612ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2012Case 27-CA-076979ClosedWestminster, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 December 2011Case 27-CA-071195ClosedCentennial, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2011Case 27-CA-021885ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2011Case 27-CA-021884ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 April 2011Case 27-CA-021882ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2011Case 27-CA-021824ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2010Case 27-CA-021697ClosedAurora, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 September 2010Case 27-CA-021695ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2010Case 27-CA-021638ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2010Case 27-CA-021473ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2010Case 27-CA-021471ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2009Case 27-CA-021398ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2009Case 27-CA-021382ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 27-CA-021351ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2009Case 27-CA-021335ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 27-CA-021329ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2009Case 27-CA-021319ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2009Case 27-CA-021294ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 July 2009Case 27-CA-021290ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2009Case 27-CA-021278ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2009Case 27-CA-021277ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2009Case 27-CA-021261ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 May 2009Case 27-CA-021255ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 May 2009Case 27-CA-021250ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2009Case 27-CA-021245ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 May 2009Case 27-CA-021244ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2009Case 27-CA-021236ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
King Soopers, Inc
CA
Filed 4 May 2009Case 27-CA-021220ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2009Case 27-CA-021218ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 December 2008Case 27-CA-021105ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2008Case 27-CA-021088ClosedEnglewood, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 July 2008Case 27-CA-020944ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 June 2008Case 27-CA-020904ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2008Case 27-CA-020896ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2008Case 27-CA-020883ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2008Case 27-CA-020877ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2008Case 27-CA-020871ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2008Case 27-CA-020765ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2007Case 27-CA-020716ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2007Case 27-CA-020715ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2007Case 27-CA-020691ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
King Soopers, Inc
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 27-CA-020685ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 1 October 2007Case 27-UC-000223ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 21
Included: All bakery maintenance employees employed in teh Employer's bakery. Excluded: Office clerical employees, guards, supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2007Case 27-CA-020643ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
King Soopers, Inc
CA
Filed 19 September 2007Case 27-CA-020638ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 July 2007Case 27-CA-020534ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2007Case 27-CA-020532ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 June 2007Case 27-CA-020520ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 8 June 2007Case 27-UC-000222ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 21
Included: All bakery maintenance employees employed in the Employer's bakery. Petitioner seeks to clarify the unit by including the classification of Parts Clerk, which has been historically included in the bargaining unit until the Employer removed it recently over the petitioners objection. Excluded: Office clerical employees, guards, supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 April 2007Case 27-CA-020452ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2007Case 27-CA-020427ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 79
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2007Case 27-CA-020399ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100

Page 1 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.