Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Macy's, Inc.

82 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 82 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 16, 19, 20, 21, 29, 32 · Boston, MA; Braintree, MA; Concord, CA; Costa Mesa, CA; Elmhurst, NY; Garden City, NY and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	77
RC	Petition for an election	3
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2025Case 32-CA-357987ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 5
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 1 November 2024Case 21-CA-354063ClosedCosta Mesa, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2024Case 32-CA-351964ClosedWalnut Creek, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 85,581
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 5 August 2024Case 32-CA-348101ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2024Case 19-CA-333631ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2023Case 19-CA-330635ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2023Case 19-CA-330221ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2023Case 19-CA-329399ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2023Case 19-CA-326583ClosedLynnwood, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 400
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 12 January 2023Case 20-CA-310284ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2022Case 01-CA-296835ClosedWarwick, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 May 2022Case 01-CA-296814ClosedBraintree, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2021Case 02-CA-282904ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2021Case 20-CA-278364ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2021Case 19-CA-277336ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2020Case 20-CA-270110ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2020Case 20-CA-270047OpenSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2020Case 20-CA-269858ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2020Case 20-CA-267621ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2020Case 20-CA-267603ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2019Case 02-CA-252988OpenNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 500
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 30 August 2019Case 01-CA-247446ClosedWarwick, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 9 August 2019Case 01-CA-246367ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 11 July 2019Case 01-CA-244693ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 June 2019Case 01-RC-243758ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 80
Included: The Petitioner seeks an election in a residual unit of all eligible unrepresented full-time and regular part-time employees at the Employer’s Downtown Boston store, including but not limited to cosmetics and fragrance employees, office clerical employees, gift registry, and visual department employees, and seeks to add those employees to the existing bargaining unit represented by the Petitioner at the ...
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 3 January 2019Case 01-CA-233522ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 17 September 2018Case 01-CA-227443ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 16 August 2018Case 02-CA-225872ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 16 August 2018Case 01-CA-225778ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2018Case 02-CA-224098ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,500
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 12 July 2018Case 01-CA-223582ClosedPeabody, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 27 June 2018Case 01-CA-222912ClosedPeabody, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 15 June 2018Case 01-CA-222124ClosedPeabody, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 31 May 2018Case 02-CA-221274ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2018Case 02-CA-219323ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2018Case 20-CA-218627ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 500
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 8 September 2017Case 01-CA-205854ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 4 May 2017Case 01-CA-198256ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 10
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 22 February 2017Case 01-CA-193675ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 February 2017Case 02-CA-192977ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 10
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 23 December 2016Case 01-CA-190364ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 4 November 2016Case 02-CA-187640ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,000
MACY'S INC
CA
Filed 24 October 2016Case 01-CA-186890ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 14 September 2016Case 02-CA-184264ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 11 August 2016Case 02-CA-181908ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 10 August 2016Case 02-CA-181898ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2016Case 19-CA-176634ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 4 May 2016Case 02-CA-175577ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 December 2015Case 02-CA-166230ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2015Case 19-CA-159194ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 101
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2015Case 19-CA-158439ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2015Case 02-CA-154879ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2014Case 19-CA-138406ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 700,000
MACY'S, INC.
CA
Filed 1 October 2014Case 01-CA-137863ClosedSAUGUS, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 40
MACY'S, INC.
CA
Filed 26 September 2014Case 21-CA-137632ClosedORANGE, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2014Case 19-CA-136950ClosedSnohomish, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2014Case 29-CA-129894ClosedGarden City, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 March 2014Case 01-CA-123640ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
MACY'S, INC.
CA
Filed 5 November 2013Case 01-CA-116378ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 42
MACY'S, INC.
RC
Filed 30 August 2013Case 19-RC-112417ClosedREDMOND, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 19
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Sales Associates, Receiving /Stock Associates, and Sales Support Associates, employed by the Employer at its Redmond, Washington store located at 15340 NE 24th Street. Excluded: All other employees, managers, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Macy's Inc.
CA
Filed 1 May 2013Case 29-CA-104282ClosedElmhurst, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 20
Macy's Inc.
RD
Filed 17 April 2013Case 29-RD-103044ClosedElmhurst, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 20
Included: All regular full-time and regular part-time sales associates and stock associates employed by the Employer in its bedding, stock and furniture departments at its retail furniture store located at 88-01 Queens Boulevard, Elmhurst, New York 11373. Excluded: All rug department employees, selling floor leaders, assistant managers, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards, and supervisors as ...
MACY'S, INC.
CA
Filed 13 March 2013Case 01-CA-100305ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 30
MACY'S INC.
CA
Filed 19 September 2012Case 16-CA-089570ClosedLaredo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 11 June 2012Case 29-RD-082789ClosedElmhurst, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 21
Included: All full-time and regular part-time sales associated and stock associates employed by the Employer in its bedding, stock and furniture departments at its retail furniture store located at 88-01 Queens Boulevard, Elmhurst, New York. Excluded: All rug department employees, selling floor leaders, assistant managers, managers, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2010Case 19-CA-032729ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2010Case 19-CA-032705ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2010Case 19-CA-032686ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2010Case 19-CA-032667ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2010Case 19-CA-032649ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2010Case 19-CA-032587ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2010Case 19-CA-032543ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2010Case 19-CA-032539ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2010Case 19-CA-032454ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2010Case 19-CA-032432ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2010Case 19-CA-032418ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2010Case 19-CA-032411ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2010Case 19-CA-032410ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2010Case 19-CA-032366ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2009Case 19-CA-031817ClosedSnohomish, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 188
Macy's Inc.
RC
Filed 17 February 2009Case 29-RC-011722ClosedElmhurst, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 21
Included: All full time and regular part time sales associates and stock associates employed by the employer in its bedding stock and furniture departments at its retail furniture shore located at 88-01 Queens Boulevard Elmhurst New York. Excluded: All other employees rug department employees customer service department employees assistant managers managers office clerical employees professional employees guards and ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2009Case 19-CA-031704ClosedSnohomish, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 188,000

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.