Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Macy's

65 cases in this site's copy of the record · 0 of those 65 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 12, 13, 16, 19, 20, 22, 29, 31, 32 · Aventura, FL; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Federal Way, WA; Fort Worth, TX; Lynnwood, WA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	62
RC	Petition for an election	1
RD	Petition to decertify	2

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 March 2026Case 19-CA-382416ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2025Case 31-CA-357839ClosedSherman Oaks, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2024Case 02-CA-353698ClosedManhattan, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2023Case 01-CA-320068ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2023Case 22-CA-315152ClosedSecaucus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2022Case 20-CA-299577ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 6
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2022Case 32-CA-292868ClosedPalo Alto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2020Case 20-CA-256771ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 3
MACY'S
CA
Filed 12 February 2020Case 01-CA-256332ClosedBoston, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2019Case 19-CA-246438ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 69
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2019Case 19-CA-246420ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 69
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2019Case 19-CA-246397ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 69
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2019Case 02-CA-244789ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2019Case 02-CA-235756ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2018Case 02-CA-233068ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2018Case 20-CA-216112ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 550
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2017Case 02-CA-206578ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 April 2017Case 32-CA-197552ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2017Case 32-CA-193732ClosedSanta Clara, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
MACY'S
CA
Filed 20 June 2016Case 01-CA-178614ClosedNashua, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
MACY'S
CA
Filed 1 February 2016Case 12-CA-168840ClosedAventura, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2015Case 02-CA-160710ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2015Case 32-CA-156665ClosedPleasanton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
MACY'S
RD
Filed 30 June 2015Case 32-RD-155171ClosedPleasanton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 25
Included: All full-time and regular part-time furniture, rug, mattress, furniture sales/interior designer-sales, administrative support team and receiving (stockroom) employees employed by the Employer in its mattress, stock and furniture departments at its retail furniture store located at 4225 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588. Excluded: All managers, assistant managers, office clerical employees, confidential ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2015Case 20-CA-154845ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2015Case 02-CA-152832ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2015Case 02-CA-152599ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2015Case 16-CA-151949ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 501
MACY'S
CA
Filed 16 March 2015Case 16-CA-148291ClosedFort Worth, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 501
MACY'S
CA
Filed 23 February 2015Case 22-CA-146982ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
MACY'S
CA
Filed 20 February 2015Case 22-CA-146719ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2015Case 02-CA-146508ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300
MACY'S
CA
Filed 12 January 2015Case 02-CA-144263ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300
MACY'S
CA
Filed 5 January 2015Case 22-CA-143832ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
MACY'S
CA
Filed 5 January 2015Case 22-CA-143828ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2014Case 02-CA-142860ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300
MACY'S
CA
Filed 24 November 2014Case 22-CA-141562ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
MACY'S
CA
Filed 6 October 2014Case 22-CA-138183ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
MACY'S
CA
Filed 7 July 2014Case 22-CA-132286ClosedWAYNE, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2014Case 20-CA-121320ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2013Case 13-CA-113836ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2013Case 13-CA-109622ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2013Case 13-CA-103563ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 12 October 2012Case 01-RC-091163ClosedSaugus, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 33
All Full & Part time employees in cosmetics and men's & women's fragrances
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2012Case 19-CA-090162ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2012Case 19-CA-085939ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2012Case 20-CA-085356ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2012Case 19-CA-078260ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 260
MACY'S
CA
Filed 6 February 2012Case 02-CA-073882ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 June 2011Case 19-CA-033132ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2010Case 19-CA-032415ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2009Case 19-CA-031972ClosedLynnwood, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 March 2009Case 19-CA-031787ClosedFederal Way, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2008Case 29-CA-029248ClosedValley Stream, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 March 2008Case 20-CA-033843ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2007Case 02-CA-038516ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2007Case 19-CA-030840ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 28 February 2007Case 19-RD-003754ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
Included: All full-time and regular part-time sales associates employed by the Employer at its 4502 S. Steele Street, Tacoma, WA location. Excluded: All supervisors and guards as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2006Case 20-CA-033238ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2006Case 22-CA-027759ClosedWayne, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2006Case 02-CA-037940ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 May 2006Case 20-CA-032978ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 March 2006Case 02-CA-037551ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 1999Case 34-CA-009020ClosedWhite Plains, NYRegion 01Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 1998Case 02-CA-031255ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.