Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

Starbucks

58 cases in this site's copy of the record · 2 of those 58 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 07, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 27, 31 · Alexandria, VA; Arlington Heights, IL; Bloomington, MN; Bryn Mawr, PA; Burbank, CA; Clarksville, IN and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	54
RD	Petition to decertify	4

The cases

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 June 2026Case 01-CA-388176ClosedSmithfield, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 21
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2026Case 31-CA-381317OpenLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 35
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2026Case 10-CA-380963OpenDunwoody, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2025Case 16-CA-377904ClosedFarmers Branch, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2025Case 07-CA-371972ClosedScio, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2025Case 05-CA-361145ClosedEllicott City, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 25
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 27 February 2025Case 03-RD-361063ClosedNiskayuna, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 50
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Baristas and shift supervisors employed by the Employer at Store #7363. Excluded: Store managers; office and clerical; guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2025Case 04-CA-358130ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2024Case 13-CA-336721ClosedEvanston, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 11
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2024Case 14-CA-335577ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2024Case 04-CA-335132ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2024Case 04-CA-335123ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2024Case 04-CA-335120ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2024Case 04-CA-333414ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2024Case 04-CA-333205ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2024Case 04-CA-333204ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2024Case 04-CA-332983ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 January 2024Case 04-CA-332980ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 2024Case 04-CA-332973ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 December 2023Case 04-CA-332623ClosedEaston, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2023Case 04-CA-332452ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2023Case 04-CA-332450ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 December 2023Case 04-CA-331390ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 December 2023Case 04-CA-331386ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 December 2023Case 04-CA-331384ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2023Case 04-CA-331016ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2023Case 27-CA-330639ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2023Case 04-CA-330400ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 November 2023Case 04-CA-330378ClosedBryn Mawr, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 55
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 18 October 2023Case 03-RD-328126ClosedDepew, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 30
Included: All full-time and regular part-time baristas, shift supervisors and assistant store managers employed by the Employer at its store located at 4770 Transit Rd, Depew, New York,14043. Excluded: Office clerical employees, guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2023Case 04-CA-327969ClosedMedia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2023Case 04-CA-324332ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 9
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 10 July 2023Case 10-RD-321387ClosedRoanoke, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 20
Included: Partners currently employed at the Bridges Starbucks store as of this filing. Excluded: Partners not employed as of filing, anyone above SSV position.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2023Case 04-CA-321451ClosedEaston, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1,000
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 29 June 2023Case 10-RD-320945ClosedRoanoke, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 20
Included: Partners currently employed at the Bridges Starbucks Store as of this filing. Excluded: Partners not employed as of filing.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2023Case 14-CA-309747ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 17
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2022Case 12-CA-306451ClosedSaint Petersburg, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2022Case 05-CA-306450ClosedAlexandria, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 October 2022Case 18-CA-305852ClosedGermantown, WIRegion 18Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2022Case 05-CA-302598ClosedWaynesboro, PARegion 05Workers in the unit 23
STARBUCKS
CA
Filed 15 August 2022Case 09-CA-301419ClosedClarksville, INRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2022Case 14-CA-298038ClosedFrontenac, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 26
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2022Case 31-CA-297869ClosedLenwood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 18
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2021Case 31-CA-283427ClosedBurbank, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2021Case 31-CA-271020ClosedOxnard, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 37
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2020Case 04-CA-268749ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2018Case 16-CA-230469ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 September 2018Case 20-CA-227766ClosedLoomis, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2018Case 20-CA-225826ClosedLoomis, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2018Case 20-CA-224985ClosedLoomis, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2017Case 20-CA-191941ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 October 2015Case 14-CA-162077ClosedOmaha, NERegion 14Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2013Case 16-CA-111788ClosedWeslaco, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2011Case 20-CA-035383ClosedLoomis, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 12
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2010Case 19-CA-032781ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 July 2008Case 18-CA-018798ClosedBloomington, MNRegion 18Workers in the unit 14
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2007Case 13-CA-043969ClosedArlington Heights, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2007Case 22-CA-027837ClosedWayne, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 12

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.