Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

American Medical Response

455 cases in this site's copy of the record · 6 of those 455 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 08, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 31, 32 · Aiea, HI; Akron, OH; Amarillo, TX; Baldwin Park, CA; Bridgeport, CT; Buellton, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	414
CB	Charge against a union	1
RC	Petition for an election	26
RD	Petition to decertify	8
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	6

The cases

Page 2 of 4, newest first: 1 2 3 4

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2013Case 19-CA-096517ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2013Case 01-CA-096289ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 December 2012Case 19-CA-094860ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2012Case 28-CA-094172ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 November 2012Case 34-CA-092883ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2012Case 34-CA-091077ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 September 2012Case 34-CA-090095ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 27
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2012Case 34-CA-090109ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2012Case 34-CA-087663ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 August 2012Case 34-CA-087645ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 24
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2012Case 19-CA-087434ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2012Case 19-CA-087406ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2012Case 28-CA-087120ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2012Case 34-CA-086585ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2012Case 28-CA-084867ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2012Case 28-CA-084843ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2012Case 28-CA-084746ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2012Case 01-CA-081227ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 28-CA-081050ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 May 2012Case 28-CA-080940ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2012Case 28-CA-078894ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2012Case 31-CA-078215ClosedREDLANDS, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 410
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 28 March 2012Case 01-CA-077694ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 March 2012Case 32-CA-077227ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 February 2012Case 34-CA-073743ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2012Case 19-CA-072270ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 January 2012Case 19-CA-072069ClosedCentralia, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2011Case 34-CA-068352ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 27 October 2011Case 34-RC-067645ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 35
Included: All full-time and regular part-time transportation services employees, including chair car drivers, employed by the Employer at the 130 Shield St. West Hartford, CT facility. Excluded: EMT's, Paramedics, Ambulance Dispatchers, Building and Ground Employees, Maintenance Employees, Office Clerical Employees, Professional Employees, Guards, Managerial Employees and all Supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2011Case 34-CA-067629ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 24 October 2011Case 34-RD-067328ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 286
All full-time and regular part-time paramedics, EMTs and HandiVan Drivers; but excluding all other employees, and guards, prefessional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2011Case 32-CA-067390ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 13 October 2011Case 34-RD-066652ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 286
All full-time and regular part-time Paramedics, EMTs, and Handi-Van Drivers employed by the Employer at its New Haven, Connecticut facility; but excluding all other employees, mechanics, dispatchers, office clerical employees, and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066366ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066365ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066256ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066254ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066251ClosedHonolulu, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066173ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066172ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066171ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066170ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 5 October 2011Case 20-CA-066168ClosedHONOLULU, HIRegion 20Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 September 2011Case 34-CA-065800ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 September 2011Case 19-CA-065685ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 September 2011Case 34-CA-064906ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 12 September 2011Case 34-RC-064380ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 201
All full-time and regular part-time emergency medical technicians (EMT, EMT-1) and paramedics employed by the Employer at or out of its West Hartford, Bloomfield, Putnam and Rockville, Connecticut facilities; but excluding all building and grounds employees, maintenance employees, office clerical employees, professional employees, guards, chair car and livery drivers and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 August 2011Case 32-CA-063178ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2011Case 31-CA-030311ClosedRedlands, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 12 July 2011Case 31-CA-030302ClosedRedlands, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 20 June 2011Case 28-UC-060436ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 360
Included: All full-time and part-time paramedics, EMT I's , and EMT's employed by the Employer at it's Las Vegas, Nevada facility. Excluded: All other employees, office clerical employees, supply employees, dispatchers, special event employees, transporters, field training officers, guards and supervisors as defined under the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2011Case 19-CA-033115ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 75
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 June 2011Case 31-RC-008875ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 410
Included: All full-time and regular part-time; Paramedics, Emergency Medical Technicians, Vehicle Service Technicians and Couriers employed by the employer at its Rancho Cucamonga and redlands Operations and all outlying stations of those operations. Excluded: All other employees including: office clerical, adminstrative, confidential, professional, managers, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 25 May 2011Case 31-CA-030232ClosedRedlands, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 May 2011Case 31-RC-008872ClosedRedlands, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 410
Included: All full-time and regular part-time; Paramedics, Emergency Medical Technicians, Vehicle SErvice Technicians and Couriers employed by the employer at its Rancho Cucamonga, and Redlands Operations and all outlying stations of those operations. Excluded: All other employees including; office clerical, administrative, confidential, professional, managers, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2011Case 27-CA-021894ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2011Case 31-CA-030194ClosedRedlands, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2011Case 08-CA-039318ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 20
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 17 December 2010Case 31-RD-001618ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 93
Included: All full-time and regular part-time EMTs and Paramedics employed, stationed or deployed by the employer from its facility located at 12638 Saticoy Souty, North Hollywood, California. Exluded: All other employees are excluded, including office clerical employees, confidential employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the National Labor Relations Act.
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 6 December 2010Case 31-RD-001617ClosedNorth Hollywood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 93
Included: All Part Time/Full Time EMT's and Paramedics currently stationed out of AMR North Hollywood Excluded: n/a
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 November 2010Case 19-CA-032850ClosedTacoma, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2010Case 16-CA-027738ClosedAmarillo, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 76
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2010Case 34-CA-012812ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2010Case 31-CA-029916ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2010Case 31-CA-029915ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 110
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 31-CA-029808ClosedNorth Hollywood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2010Case 08-CA-038997ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 180
Petition to decertify
RD
Filed 23 June 2010Case 31-RD-001607ClosedHollywood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 84
Included: All Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics currently stationed at AMR North Hollywood Excluded:
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2010Case 19-CA-032576ClosedSpokane, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 147
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 17 June 2010Case 05-RC-016467ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 65
Included: All full-time and part-time emergency medical technicians, paramedics and drivers Excluded: All office clerical employees and supervisors and guards as defined by the Act
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2010Case 05-CA-035911ClosedWashington, DCRegion 05Workers in the unit 65
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2010Case 20-CA-035079ClosedBurlingame, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 56
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 May 2010Case 32-CA-025104ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 5
Charge against a union
CB
Filed 6 May 2010Case 32-CB-006946ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 5 April 2010Case 32-UC-000428ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 3,520
All full-time and regularly scheduled part-time employees in Northern California, including EMT-1's, EMT-2's, EMT-P's, Drivers, Wheelchair Van Drivers (Sacramento only), and RNs in Alameda, Contra Costa, Calaveras, Marin, Monterey, Placer, Sacramento, San Benito, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Shasta, Solano, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tulare and Yolo Counties. Dispatchers, ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2010Case 31-CA-029653ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 March 2010Case 08-CA-038847ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 180
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 1 March 2010Case 31-RC-008798ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 300
Included: All full time and part time Paramedics, Emergency Medical Technicians and Vehicle Service Technicians Employed by the Employer in its operations located in Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Fontana, Chino, Redlands, Yucaipa, Loma Linda, Highland, and San Bernardino California Excluded: excluding all other employees, including office clerical and administrative employees, confidential employees, professional ...
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2010Case 32-CA-024970ClosedMarina, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 172
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2010Case 34-CA-012603ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2010Case 34-CA-012600ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2010Case 34-CA-012599ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 15
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 16 February 2010Case 27-RC-008586ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 156
Included: All full-time and part-time EMT's, intermediates, Paramedics, Field Trainers, Telecommunications Operators, Dispatchers, and Wheel Chair Van Drivers at its Boulder, Denver, Golden and Longmont Operations. Excluded: Office Clerical Employees, managerial employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the National Labor Relations Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2010Case 34-CA-012591ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 34-CA-012580ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 January 2010Case 19-CA-032314ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2009Case 34-CA-012559ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2009Case 34-CA-012558ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2009Case 34-CA-012551ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2009Case 34-CA-012543ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 November 2009Case 34-CA-012520ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2009Case 34-CA-012515ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2009Case 34-CA-012514ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2009Case 08-CA-038646ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 330
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 34-CA-012500ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 34-CA-012499ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 17-CA-024697ClosedTopeka, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2009Case 34-CA-012480ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2009Case 01-CA-045697ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 October 2009Case 19-CA-032146ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2009Case 34-CA-012475ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2009Case 34-CA-012474ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2009Case 34-CA-012471ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2009Case 01-CA-045680ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2009Case 01-CA-045679ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 34-CA-012469ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 34-CA-012468ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 34-CA-012467ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 34-CA-012466ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 34-CA-012465ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 September 2009Case 34-CA-012456ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2009Case 34-CA-012435ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2009Case 21-CA-038961ClosedPalm Springs, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 August 2009Case 01-CA-045557ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2009Case 34-CA-012397ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2009Case 34-CA-012396ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2009Case 01-CA-045530ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 900
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 10 July 2009Case 34-RC-002322ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Included: All full-time and regular part-time Paramedics, Emergency Medical Technicians, Chair Car Drivers and School Bus Drivers employed by the Employer at its Waterbury and Southington, Connecticut facilities. Excluded: Office Clerical Employees, Directorial Employees, Guards, Professional Employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 23 June 2009Case 21-RC-021143ClosedPalm Springs, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 90
Included: All full-time and regular part-time EMT's, Paramedics, CCT Pamamedics, VST's Excluded: All other employees including dispatchers, cleerical, billing, supervisors, managers, and guards.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2009Case 34-CA-012356ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2009Case 03-CA-027169ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 03Workers in the unit 220
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 34-CA-012352ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 03-CA-027155ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 03Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 21-CA-038801ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2009Case 32-CA-024342ClosedTurlock, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2009Case 08-CA-038175ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2009Case 34-CA-012272ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 52
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2009Case 34-CA-012271ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 52
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2009Case 32-CA-024327ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2009Case 01-CA-045172ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 January 2009Case 21-CA-038663ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2009Case 31-CA-029053ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2009Case 21-CA-038662ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2009Case 21-CA-038661ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2008Case 28-CA-022244ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2008Case 28-CA-022236ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2008Case 28-CA-022232ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2008Case 28-CA-022231ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2008Case 28-CA-022229ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2008Case 34-CA-012191ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2008Case 31-CA-028982ClosedMoonpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2008Case 01-CA-045044ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 34-CA-012184ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 253
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 34-CA-012183ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 53
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 01-CA-045041ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 01-CA-045040ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,049
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 01-CA-045039ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,049
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 31 October 2008Case 01-UC-000872ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 23
All full time and regular part time and per diem call receiving operators, system status controllers, and lead systems status controllers employed by the Employer at its Springfield operation dispatch center facility located at 595 Cottage Street, Springfield, Massachusetts but excluding the communications manager, office clerical employees, managers and all others
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 34-CA-012178ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 34-CA-012177ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 55

Page 2 of 4, newest first: 1 2 3 4

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.