Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

American Medical Response

455 cases in this site's copy of the record · 6 of those 455 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 03, 04, 05, 08, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 31, 32 · Aiea, HI; Akron, OH; Amarillo, TX; Baldwin Park, CA; Bridgeport, CT; Buellton, CA and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	414
CB	Charge against a union	1
RC	Petition for an election	26
RD	Petition to decertify	8
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	6

The cases

Page 3 of 4, newest first: 1 2 3 4

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 34-CA-012176ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 October 2008Case 01-CA-045029ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 23
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 October 2008Case 28-CA-022173ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2008Case 34-CA-012161ClosedWaterbury, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 2 September 2008Case 34-RC-002285ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 55
Included: All full-time and part-time transportation services employees including Chair Car Drivers, Attendants, Companions and Transportation Dispatchers. Excluded: EMT's, Paramedics, Ambulance Dispatchers, buildings and grounds employees, maintenance employees, office clerical employees, guards, managers, supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2008Case 34-CA-012116ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 August 2008Case 31-CA-028888ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2008Case 28-CA-022073ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 370
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 August 2008Case 01-CA-044846ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,035
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 22 July 2008Case 01-RC-022235ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Included: All full time part time per diem System Status Controllers, Lead System Status Controllers and Call Receiving Operators at the Springfield Operation Dispatch Center Excluded: Management and supervisors as specifically defined in the Act, and guards
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2008Case 32-CA-024013ClosedSan Jose, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2008Case 19-CA-031454ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 July 2008Case 12-CA-025898ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 232
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 June 2008Case 31-CA-028807ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2008Case 34-CA-012071ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 330
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2008Case 31-CA-028790ClosedBuellton, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2008Case 34-CA-012063ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2008Case 31-CA-028757ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 160
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2008Case 01-CA-044657ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,199
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 5 May 2008Case 34-RC-002268ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 235
Included: All greater Hartford and Northest Division full time and part time Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT, EMT-1) and Paramedics. Excluded: All management personnel; supervisors as specifically defined in the Act; maintenance, buiding & grounds, clerical, professional, chair car and livery employees; guards.
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 14 April 2008Case 25-CA-030661ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 110
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 25 March 2008Case 34-CA-012009ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2008Case 01-CA-044502ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,237
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 March 2008Case 01-CA-044501ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,237
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2008Case 01-CA-044461ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,248
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2008Case 01-CA-044460ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,248
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2008Case 01-CA-044459ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,248
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2008Case 32-CA-023757ClosedLivermore, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,400
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 7 February 2008Case 34-RC-002247ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 220
Included: All full time and part time emergency medical technicians, paramedics and chair car drivers. Excluded: All other employees, including supervisors, guards, and other employees as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2008Case 01-CA-044436ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,247
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 January 2008Case 01-CA-044433ClosedSpringfield, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2008Case 36-CA-010239ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 557
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 January 2008Case 34-CA-011941ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2007Case 31-CA-028614ClosedNo. Hollywood, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 December 2007Case 32-CA-023692ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2007Case 32-CA-023648ClosedStockton, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 November 2007Case 12-CA-025624ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 36-CA-010208ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 560
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2007Case 12-CA-025620ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 October 2007Case 12-CA-025615ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 180
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2007Case 34-CA-011880ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 25 October 2007Case 34-RC-002236ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Included: All regular part time paramedics, emt's hand-van drivers and mechanics. Excluded: All other employees, supervisors, dispatchers and guards as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2007Case 01-CA-044251ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 18,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2007Case 01-CA-044229ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 3 October 2007Case 01-UC-000859ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,042
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 September 2007Case 31-CA-028452ClosedBuellton, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2007Case 34-CA-011837ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2007Case 01-CA-044142ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 28 August 2007Case 01-RC-022142ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 3
Included: Company mechanics
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2007Case 12-CA-025510ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 August 2007Case 12-CA-025508ClosedFort Pierce, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 32-CA-023404ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044079ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044078ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044077ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044076ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044075ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044074ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044073ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2007Case 01-CA-044072ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 July 2007Case 12-CA-025477ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2007Case 01-CA-044016ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2007Case 01-CA-044015ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2007Case 01-CA-044014ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2007Case 01-CA-044013ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2007Case 01-CA-044012ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2007Case 12-CA-025456ClosedMiami, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2007Case 32-CA-023297ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 2,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 May 2007Case 19-CA-030853ClosedPasco, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2007Case 31-CA-028282ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2007Case 12-CA-025395ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2007Case 12-CA-025394ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2007Case 31-CA-028253ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 April 2007Case 19-RC-014973ClosedYakima, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 15
Included: All full-time and part-time EMTs and paramedics employed at the Employer's facilities in Tri-Cities area. Excluded: All other employees, office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined by the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2007Case 32-CA-023199ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 April 2007Case 34-CA-011729ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2007Case 32-CA-023175ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 240
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2007Case 32-CA-023171ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2007Case 32-CA-023170ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 March 2007Case 32-CA-023136ClosedModesto, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 17,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 March 2007Case 01-CA-043839ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 March 2007Case 31-CA-028208ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 March 2007Case 31-CA-028204ClosedCerritos, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2007Case 32-CA-023083ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2007Case 32-CA-023078ClosedConcord, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 360
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2007Case 31-CA-028175ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 31-CA-028158ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 25-CA-030256ClosedFort Wayne, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2007Case 21-CA-037659ClosedCerritos, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 550
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2007Case 01-CA-043768ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2007Case 31-CA-028141ClosedGreenwood Village, CORegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 January 2007Case 01-CA-043758ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 January 2007Case 01-CA-043756ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 January 2007Case 31-CA-028101ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 December 2006Case 01-CA-043704ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 20-CA-033236ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 01-CA-043697ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 01-CA-043696ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 01-CA-043695ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2006Case 01-CA-043694ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2006Case 01-CA-043674ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 956
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2006Case 34-CA-011635ClosedWest Hartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2006Case 36-CA-010044ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 550
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 November 2006Case 04-CA-035043ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 01-CA-043582ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 01-CA-043581ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 November 2006Case 01-CA-043580ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 November 2006Case 31-CA-028054ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2006Case 36-CA-010034ClosedPortland, ORRegion 19Workers in the unit 550
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 01-CA-043541ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 01-CA-043540ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 01-CA-043538ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2006Case 01-CA-043537ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 October 2006Case 01-CA-043522ClosedNatick, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 September 2006Case 31-CA-027981ClosedVictorville, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2006Case 20-CA-033132ClosedRedding, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2006Case 12-CA-025098ClosedFort Pierce, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2006Case 20-CA-033023ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 4
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2006Case 31-CA-027855ClosedRancho Cucamonga, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 February 2006Case 31-CA-027716ClosedTorrance, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 January 2006Case 31-CA-027680ClosedMoorpark, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2005Case 31-CA-027591ClosedTorrance, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2005Case 31-CA-027571ClosedVictorville, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 85
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2005Case 31-CA-027570ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2005Case 08-CA-036175ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2005Case 31-CA-027544ClosedLancaster, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 135
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 August 2005Case 08-CA-036058ClosedAkron, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 230
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 February 2005Case 31-CA-027234ClosedCerritos, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2005Case 34-CA-011081ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2005Case 34-CA-011065ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2004Case 34-CA-010924ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 March 2004Case 12-CA-023778ClosedLargo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2003Case 12-CA-023556ClosedLargo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 375
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 12 November 2003Case 34-CA-010683ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 October 2003Case 12-CA-023491ClosedLargo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2003Case 34-CA-010645ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 100
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 18 August 2003Case 34-CA-010581ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 350
Petition to clarify a unit
UC
Filed 18 August 2003Case 12-UC-000156ClosedLargo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 375
Included all full time and regular part time emergency medical technicians (EMT's), paramedics, materials management employees, system status controllers (SSC's), and feet technicians, employed by the Employer at 12490 Ulmerton Road, Largo, Florida, including those employees who work at the Employer's Ulmerton Road location under the Employer's velcro program. Excluded registered nurses, office clerical employees, ...
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE
CA
Filed 14 August 2003Case 34-CA-010574ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2003Case 21-CA-035848ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2003Case 31-CA-026368ClosedTorrance, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 1,500
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 20 June 2003Case 34-RC-002039ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 160
Included: All full-time and regular part-time dispatchers, drivers, EMT's, EMT-Intermediates, and EMT-Paramedics employed by the employer. Excluded: All other employees including office, clerical and administrative, managers supervisors and guards as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2003Case 12-CA-023099ClosedLargo, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 375
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2003Case 21-CA-035744ClosedRiverside, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 340
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2003Case 34-CA-010486ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2003Case 34-CA-010453ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2003Case 34-CA-010437ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2003Case 34-CA-010432ClosedBridgeport, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 February 2003Case 34-CA-010395ClosedNew Haven, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2002Case 28-CA-018090ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 100

Page 3 of 4, newest first: 1 2 3 4

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.