Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

King Soopers, Inc.

199 cases in this site's copy of the record · 3 of those 199 are marked open by the Board · Region 27 · Aurora, CO; Bennett, CO; Broomfield, CO; Castle Rock, CO; Centennial, CO; Colorado Springs, CO and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	193
RC	Petition for an election	4
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 February 2007Case 27-CA-020398ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 February 2007Case 27-CA-020385ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 6 February 2007Case 27-RC-008481ClosedCastle Rock, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 15
Included: All meat cutters, apprentices, meat wrappers, butcher blockemployees, sushi bar chef, snack bar/meat clean-up, deli employees and Starbucks employees including the manager(s) and part-time workers who work regulary one (1) day or more a week, employed by King Soopers in Castle Rock, Colorado. Excluded: All store managers, courtesy clerks, office clerical employees, guards, professional employees, ...
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 24 January 2007Case 27-RC-008477ClosedCastle Rock, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 15
Included: All meat cutters, apprentices, wrappers, butcher block employees, and clean-up personnel including the mamager(s) and including part-time workers who work regularly (1) day or more a week, employed by King Soopers in Caslte Rock Colorado. Excluded: All store mamagers, courtesy clerks, office clerical employees, guards, professional employees, supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2006Case 27-CA-020281ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 October 2006Case 27-CA-020236ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2006Case 27-CA-020146ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 May 2006Case 27-CA-020067ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2006Case 27-CA-020039ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 117
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2006Case 27-CA-019997ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 March 2006Case 27-CA-019987ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2006Case 27-CA-019967ClosedColorado Springs, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2005Case 27-CA-019782ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2005Case 27-CA-019606ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2005Case 27-CA-019601ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2004Case 27-CA-019415ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2004Case 27-CA-019414ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 October 2004Case 27-CA-019305ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 October 2004Case 27-CA-019302ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 September 2004Case 27-CA-019287ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2004Case 27-CA-019263ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 September 2004Case 27-CA-019253ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2004Case 27-CA-019249ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 September 2004Case 27-CA-019248ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2004Case 27-CA-019235ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2004Case 27-CA-019231ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2004Case 27-CA-019230ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
King Soopers, Inc
CA
Filed 31 August 2004Case 27-CA-019229ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2004Case 27-CA-019227ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2004Case 27-CA-019143ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2004Case 27-CA-019125ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2004Case 27-CA-019000ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2003Case 27-CA-018749ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2003Case 27-CA-018658ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 March 2003Case 27-CA-018475ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
King Soopers Inc.
CA
Filed 18 November 2002Case 27-CA-018293ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2002Case 27-CA-017958ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 February 2002Case 27-CA-017872ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 January 2002Case 27-CA-017822ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2002Case 27-CA-017805ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2000Case 27-CA-017102ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 330
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2000Case 27-CA-016934ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2000Case 27-CA-016914ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 May 2000Case 27-CA-016902ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 1999Case 27-CA-016207ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 15,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 January 1999Case 27-CA-016197ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 1998Case 27-CA-016091ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 1998Case 27-CA-015952ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 1998Case 27-CA-015815ClosedDenver, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 120

Page 2 of 2, newest first: 1 2

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.