Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

United Parcel Service

3,831 cases in this site's copy of the record · 320 of those 3831 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · ANDERSON, CA; ASHLAND, MA; Aberdeen, MD; Abington, MA; Acworth, GA; Addison, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	3815
RC	Petition for an election	14
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Page 19 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2013Case 32-CA-098719ClosedVISALIA, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 130
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 12 February 2013Case 22-CA-098273ClosedSECAUCUS, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 8,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2013Case 19-CA-098155ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2013Case 16-CA-098152ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 February 2013Case 29-CA-098023ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2013Case 29-CA-097858ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 February 2013Case 29-CA-097855ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097643ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097642ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097640ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097639ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097609ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097602ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2013Case 29-CA-097598ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2013Case 29-CA-097552ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2013Case 29-CA-097546ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 95
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 January 2013Case 15-CA-096675ClosedSHREVEPORT, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2013Case 01-CA-096208ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 January 2013Case 01-CA-096190ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 800
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 9 January 2013Case 10-CA-096052ClosedWEST COLUMBIA, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 10
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 8 January 2013Case 16-CA-095989ClosedDALLAS, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 December 2012Case 21-CA-094684ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2012Case 29-CA-094582ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 December 2012Case 03-CA-094015ClosedLatham, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2012Case 29-CA-094097ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 29 November 2012Case 02-CA-093957ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 November 2012Case 32-CA-093710ClosedSALINAS, CARegion 32Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 20 November 2012Case 09-CA-093648ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2012Case 08-CA-093238ClosedBrilliant, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 November 2012Case 21-CA-093249ClosedCHULA VISTA, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 9 November 2012Case 09-CA-093016ClosedCHARLESTON, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 26 October 2012Case 10-CA-092213ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 October 2012Case 29-CA-091917ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2012Case 29-CA-091817ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2012Case 29-CA-091815ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 October 2012Case 03-CA-091467ClosedBuffalo, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 450
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 11 October 2012Case 10-CA-091230ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2012Case 21-CA-091041ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 5 October 2012Case 28-CA-090827ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 October 2012Case 21-CA-090698ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 2 October 2012Case 10-CA-090397ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 October 2012Case 15-CA-090343ClosedShreveport, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2012Case 29-CA-090020ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 September 2012Case 29-CA-089102ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 7 September 2012Case 10-CA-088892ClosedSAVANNAH, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 7 September 2012Case 02-CA-088829ClosedYORKTOWN HEIGHTS, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 80
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 31 August 2012Case 09-CA-088416ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 31 August 2012Case 09-CA-088415ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 31 August 2012Case 09-CA-088414ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 31 August 2012Case 09-CA-088412ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2012Case 29-CA-088391ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2012Case 24-CA-088319ClosedCAROLINA, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 300
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 28 August 2012Case 10-CA-088204ClosedChattanooga, TNRegion 10Workers in the unit 300
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 27 August 2012Case 10-CA-088042ClosedGREENSBORO, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 21 August 2012Case 22-CA-087807ClosedSECAUCUS, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 8,500
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 16 August 2012Case 10-CA-087427ClosedSavannah, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 55
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2012Case 19-CA-087086ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 13 August 2012Case 09-CA-087183ClosedCHARLESTON, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 9 August 2012Case 10-CA-086922ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 6 August 2012Case 10-CA-086678ClosedGREENVILLE, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2012Case 29-CA-086057ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2012Case 21-CA-085861ClosedSan Diego, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 20 July 2012Case 09-CA-085721ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 July 2012Case 29-CA-085556ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2012Case 10-CA-085517ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2012Case 21-CA-085314ClosedONTARIO, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2012Case 16-CA-085218ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 July 2012Case 31-CA-085242ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 215
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 2 July 2012Case 09-CA-084462ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 June 2012Case 16-CA-084387ClosedHouston, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 1,500
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 28 June 2012Case 09-CA-084194ClosedMAYSVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 44
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2012Case 29-CA-083400ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 June 2012Case 10-CA-083229ClosedTifton, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 June 2012Case 26-CA-083136ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 50
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 13 June 2012Case 09-CA-083065ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 13 June 2012Case 09-CA-083063ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 13 June 2012Case 09-CA-083062ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2012Case 29-CA-082816ClosedLong Island City, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 June 2012Case 28-CA-082539ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2012Case 13-CA-082457ClosedBedford Park, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 4 June 2012Case 22-CA-082479ClosedSECAUCUS, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 8,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 May 2012Case 26-CA-081857ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2012Case 10-CA-081725ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 May 2012Case 07-CA-081689ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 60
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 22 May 2012Case 09-CA-081593ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 22 May 2012Case 09-CA-081586ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 22 May 2012Case 09-CA-081584ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 22 May 2012Case 09-CA-081582ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 22 May 2012Case 02-CA-081558ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2012Case 16-CA-081494ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 29-CA-081156ClosedNassau, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 19-CA-081112ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 300
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 15 May 2012Case 09-CA-081107ClosedLOUISVILLE, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 7,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2012Case 29-CA-080729ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 9 May 2012Case 10-CA-080617ClosedRALEIGH, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 May 2012Case 26-CA-080148ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 350
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 1 May 2012Case 09-CA-080183ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 1 May 2012Case 09-CA-080180ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 1 May 2012Case 09-CA-080177ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 1 May 2012Case 09-CA-080175ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2012Case 10-CA-079753ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 April 2012Case 20-CA-079278ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 April 2012Case 02-CA-078841ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 5
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 12 April 2012Case 22-CA-078650ClosedSECAUCUS, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 8,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 April 2012Case 29-CA-078566ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2012Case 34-CA-078326ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 April 2012Case 29-CA-078197ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 March 2012Case 10-CA-077775ClosedBogart, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 March 2012Case 10-CA-077356ClosedAcworth, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2012Case 29-CA-077201ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 472
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2012Case 19-CA-076830ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 March 2012Case 10-CA-076745ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 14 March 2012Case 09-CA-076598ClosedOBETZ, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 250
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 13 March 2012Case 11-CA-076543ClosedRALEIGH, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2012Case 08-CA-076466ClosedGirard, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2012Case 26-CA-075775ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2012Case 14-CA-075832ClosedEarth City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2012Case 29-CA-075884ClosedBrooklyn, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 50
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 29 February 2012Case 02-CA-075570ClosedNEW YORK, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2012Case 17-CA-075365ClosedCamdenton, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2012Case 29-CA-075254ClosedLong Island City, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 3 February 2012Case 09-CA-073774ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 3 February 2012Case 09-CA-073760ClosedCINCINNATI, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2012Case 19-CA-073746ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 February 2012Case 03-CA-073658ClosedEast Syracuse, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 January 2012Case 26-CA-073625ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 27 January 2012Case 11-CA-073320ClosedWest Columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2012Case 10-CA-073353ClosedBirmingham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 January 2012Case 10-CA-073255ClosedBogart, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2012Case 17-CA-073213ClosedCamdenton, MORegion 14
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 20 January 2012Case 01-CA-073013ClosedLeominster, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 January 2012Case 26-CA-072213ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2011Case 31-CA-071808ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 215
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 December 2011Case 29-CA-071663ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 December 2011Case 10-CA-070894ClosedAcworth, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2011Case 16-CA-070588ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2011Case 14-CA-070529ClosedPeoria, ILRegion 14Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 December 2011Case 05-CA-070530ClosedBaltimore, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2011Case 10-CA-070421ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 5 December 2011Case 31-CA-070300ClosedONTARIO, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 5,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 31-CA-070098ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 December 2011Case 10-CA-069840ClosedAcworth, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 November 2011Case 28-CA-069924ClosedTempe, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2011Case 20-CA-069942ClosedRocklin, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 300
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 21 November 2011Case 31-CA-069426ClosedGardena, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 575
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2011Case 10-CA-069252ClosedBirmingham, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 15 November 2011Case 28-CA-068889ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 November 2011Case 31-CA-068389ClosedBakersfield, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 215
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2011Case 10-CA-068344ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2011Case 29-CA-068262ClosedMelville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 100

Page 19 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.