Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

United Parcel Service

3,834 cases in this site's copy of the record · 323 of those 3834 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · ANDERSON, CA; ASHLAND, MA; Aberdeen, MD; Abington, MA; Acworth, GA; Addison, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

This name is gathered, along with others, on the United Parcel Service page.

The Board has also spelled this name United Parcel Service, Inc. (509), United Parcel Service Co. (3). Every spelling of this name.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	3818
RC	Petition for an election	14
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Page 21 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2010Case 09-CA-046134ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,900
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 November 2010Case 05-CA-036277ClosedNewport News, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2010Case 25-CA-031694ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2010Case 12-CA-026962ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 November 2010Case 10-CA-038706ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2010Case 10-CA-038700ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 240,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 26-CA-023898ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 26-CA-023897ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 14-CA-030232ClosedEarth City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 101
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 11-CA-022871ClosedRaleigh, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 November 2010Case 04-CA-037804ClosedEssington, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2010Case 10-CA-038684ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2010Case 22-CA-029694ClosedSecaucus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2010Case 09-CA-046086ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 November 2010Case 09-CA-046085ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 November 2010Case 04-CA-037776ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2010Case 22-CA-029673ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 October 2010Case 09-CA-046071ClosedLouisville, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 7,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2010Case 14-CA-030220ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 101
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2010Case 01-CA-046466ClosedAshland, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 October 2010Case 09-CA-046047ClosedSharonville, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 October 2010Case 21-CA-039533ClosedChula Vista, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 October 2010Case 05-CA-036152ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 October 2010Case 09-CA-046034ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2010Case 24-CA-011644ClosedCarolina, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 October 2010Case 21-CA-039514ClosedLos Angeles, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2010Case 09-CA-046018ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 September 2010Case 11-CA-022814ClosedWest Columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 14 September 2010Case 26-CA-023831ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2010Case 26-CA-023826ClosedMemphis, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2010Case 09-CA-045977ClosedObetz, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2010Case 13-CA-046266ClosedAddison, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 September 2010Case 04-CA-037673ClosedPhiladelphia, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 September 2010Case 03-CA-027787ClosedOneonta, NYRegion 03Workers in the unit 5
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2010Case 01-CA-046343ClosedChelmsford, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 August 2010Case 10-CA-038551ClosedForest Park, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 August 2010Case 07-CA-053113ClosedJackson, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2010Case 17-CA-024942ClosedLenexa, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 August 2010Case 07-CA-053110ClosedJackson, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 August 2010Case 09-CA-045922ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 August 2010Case 34-CA-012774ClosedBrookfield, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 21-CA-039445ClosedChula Vista, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 August 2010Case 01-CA-046314ClosedBrewer, MERegion 01Workers in the unit 20
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 August 2010Case 13-CA-046206ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 July 2010Case 10-CA-038505ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 7,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 July 2010Case 09-CA-045857ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 130
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2010Case 09-CA-045822ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2010Case 09-CA-045821ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2010Case 28-CA-023105ClosedLas Vegas, NVRegion 28
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 July 2010Case 20-CA-035182ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 July 2010Case 15-CA-019682ClosedHarahan, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2010Case 13-CA-046128ClosedHodgkins, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2010Case 29-CA-030294ClosedEast Farmingdale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 June 2010Case 05-CA-035940ClosedLaurel, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 24,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2010Case 19-CA-032588ClosedPacific, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2010Case 06-CA-037001ClosedNew Stanton, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 June 2010Case 24-CA-011556ClosedCarolina, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 June 2010Case 31-CA-029788ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 3,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 June 2010Case 20-CA-035110ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 June 2010Case 02-CA-039985ClosedNew York, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2010Case 16-CA-027497ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 June 2010Case 10-CA-038451ClosedRoswell, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 3,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2010Case 19-CA-032570ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2010Case 34-CA-012716ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2010Case 29-CA-030258ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 June 2010Case 16-CA-027474ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2010Case 16-CA-027471ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 June 2010Case 16-CA-027470ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2010Case 08-CA-038963ClosedHighland Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 1
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 June 2010Case 20-CA-035058ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 May 2010Case 16-CA-027442ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 10,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2010Case 29-CA-030239ClosedEast Farmingdale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 20-CA-035037ClosedSanta Rosa, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 16-CA-027436ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 May 2010Case 10-CA-038404ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 7,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2010Case 29-CA-030222ClosedFarmingdale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2010Case 11-CA-022672ClosedWest Columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2010Case 09-CA-045635ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2010Case 12-CA-026725ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 May 2010Case 10-CA-038398ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 May 2010Case 20-CA-035026ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 May 2010Case 12-CA-026721ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2010Case 18-CA-019373ClosedDes Moines, IARegion 18Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2010Case 12-CA-026714ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 April 2010Case 15-CA-019526ClosedRobertsdale, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 90
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 April 2010Case 10-CA-038375ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2010Case 09-CA-045582ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2010Case 09-CA-045581ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 April 2010Case 09-CA-045580ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2010Case 10-CA-038365ClosedLawrenceville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 51
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2010Case 11-CA-022640ClosedNorth Charleston, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 April 2010Case 09-CA-045553ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2010Case 28-CA-022989ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2010Case 13-CA-045947ClosedHodgkins, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2010Case 16-CA-027391ClosedDallas, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 6,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 April 2010Case 34-CA-012656ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 15
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 April 2010Case 26-CA-023701ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2010Case 24-CA-011498ClosedCarolina, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 March 2010Case 09-CA-045509ClosedColumbus, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2010Case 02-CA-039786ClosedBronx, NYRegion 02Workers in the unit 300,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 March 2010Case 10-CA-038285ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 3,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 March 2010Case 10-CA-038282ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2010Case 09-CA-045476ClosedHamilton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 March 2010Case 07-CA-052763ClosedDetroit, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2010Case 20-CA-034928ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 February 2010Case 10-CA-038271ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 7,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2010Case 24-CA-011468ClosedSan Juan, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 February 2010Case 08-CA-038808ClosedMiddleburg Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2010Case 09-CA-045449ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2010Case 09-CA-045448ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2010Case 06-CA-036833ClosedNew Stanton, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 February 2010Case 11-CA-022583ClosedCharlotte, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 09-CA-045442ClosedDayton, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 February 2010Case 05-CA-035585ClosedLaurel, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 February 2010Case 08-CA-038790ClosedMiddleburg, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 February 2010Case 10-CA-038252ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2010Case 14-CA-030034ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 201
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2010Case 08-CA-038786ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 February 2010Case 08-CA-038784ClosedMiddleburg Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 February 2010Case 13-CA-045806ClosedChicago, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 February 2010Case 21-CA-039214ClosedCerritos, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 10-CA-038236ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 February 2010Case 10-CA-038235ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 January 2010Case 07-CA-052685ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 January 2010Case 04-CA-037294ClosedNewark, DERegion 04Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2010Case 01-CA-045917ClosedShrewsbury, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 January 2010Case 11-CA-022542ClosedShelby, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 7 January 2010Case 25-CA-031257ClosedINDIANAPOLIS, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 450
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2009Case 27-CA-021445ClosedBillings, MTRegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2009Case 12-CA-026591ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 December 2009Case 12-CA-026589ClosedDaytona Beach, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 December 2009Case 34-CA-012550ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 December 2009Case 01-CA-045859ClosedShrewsbury, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 December 2009Case 19-CA-032256ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2009Case 15-CA-019368ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 December 2009Case 12-CA-026575ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 December 2009Case 13-CA-045707ClosedAddison, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2009Case 12-CA-026571ClosedOrlando, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 December 2009Case 12-CA-026570ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 December 2009Case 10-CA-038171ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2009Case 20-CA-034756ClosedSacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2009Case 16-CA-027144ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 November 2009Case 16-CA-027143ClosedTexarkana, ARRegion 16Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 November 2009Case 09-CA-045285ClosedObetz, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 280
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2009Case 34-CA-012516ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 November 2009Case 07-CA-052506ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2009Case 26-CA-023569ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2009Case 10-CA-038135ClosedLawrenceville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 51
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2009Case 19-CA-032197ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2009Case 05-CA-035376ClosedRichmond, VARegion 05Workers in the unit 1,300

Page 21 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Last refreshed 22 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.