Not a government sitenlrb.fyi is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the National Labor Relations Board or any government agency. The Board's own site is at nlrb.gov.

United Parcel Service

3,831 cases in this site's copy of the record · 320 of those 3831 are marked open by the Board · Region 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 · ANDERSON, CA; ASHLAND, MA; Aberdeen, MD; Abington, MA; Acworth, GA; Addison, IL and more

Each case links to the Board's own docket page. This site holds what the Board listed, not the documents.

What kinds of case

Type	What it is	Here
CA	Charge against an employer	3815
RC	Petition for an election	14
UC	Petition to clarify a unit	2

The cases

Page 22 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 October 2009Case 12-CA-026519ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 October 2009Case 19-CA-032180ClosedPacific, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 October 2009Case 22-CA-029155ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 800
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 October 2009Case 15-CA-019295ClosedRobertsdale, ALRegion 15Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2009Case 24-CA-011336ClosedCarolina, PRRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2009Case 12-CA-026493ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 October 2009Case 12-CA-026492ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 September 2009Case 09-CA-045198ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 September 2009Case 26-CA-023530ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 September 2009Case 21-CA-039026ClosedCerritos, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 September 2009Case 19-CA-032129ClosedPacific, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 September 2009Case 28-CA-022700ClosedTempe, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 September 2009Case 22-CA-029121ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 September 2009Case 16-CA-026999ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 September 2009Case 09-CA-045156ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 September 2009Case 13-CA-045503ClosedAddison, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 50
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 3 September 2009Case 34-RC-002333ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 3
Included: Full-time and part-time customer counter clerks at Locust Street, Hartford facility. Excluded: All other employees.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 1 September 2009Case 07-CA-052363ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 19-CA-032082ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 01-CA-045608ClosedWarwick, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 August 2009Case 01-CA-045607ClosedLaconia, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2009Case 17-CA-024646ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 August 2009Case 01-CA-045592ClosedChelmsford, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 1,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 19-CA-032079ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 August 2009Case 19-CA-032078ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2009Case 19-CA-032070ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 2,100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 August 2009Case 19-CA-032069ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 August 2009Case 06-CA-036610ClosedNew Stanton, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 August 2009Case 09-CA-045098ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 August 2009Case 26-CA-023486ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 01-CA-045568ClosedNorwood, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 August 2009Case 01-CA-045567ClosedBrockton, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 August 2009Case 26-CA-023481ClosedLittle Rock, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2009Case 29-CA-029746ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 August 2009Case 11-CA-022377ClosedShelby, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2009Case 09-CA-045080ClosedAshland, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 August 2009Case 07-CA-052287ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 July 2009Case 20-CA-034598ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 July 2009Case 17-CA-024609ClosedLenexa, KSRegion 14Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 July 2009Case 01-CA-045542ClosedShrewsbury, MARegion 01Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 July 2009Case 04-CA-036906ClosedHorsham, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 20 July 2009Case 09-CA-045064ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 July 2009Case 11-CA-022362ClosedWest Columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 July 2009Case 29-CA-029710ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CA
Filed 14 July 2009Case 25-CA-031067ClosedIndianapolis, INRegion 25Workers in the unit 60
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 July 2009Case 10-CA-037971ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2009Case 29-CA-029699ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 July 2009Case 17-CA-024583ClosedOklahoma City, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2009Case 15-CA-019122ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 15Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 July 2009Case 03-CA-027231ClosedPensacola, FLRegion 03Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2009Case 17-CA-024578ClosedTulsa, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 July 2009Case 17-CA-024577ClosedTulsa, OKRegion 14Workers in the unit 50
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 July 2009Case 10-CA-037954ClosedRoswell, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2009Case 14-CA-029783ClosedEarth City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 501
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 June 2009Case 11-CA-022347ClosedFlorence, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 June 2009Case 12-CA-026397ClosedLauderhill, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 25 June 2009Case 34-CA-012380ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,400
United parcel Service
CA
Filed 23 June 2009Case 29-CA-029670ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2009Case 19-CA-031969ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2009Case 12-CA-026382ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 June 2009Case 08-CA-038394ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 June 2009Case 12-CA-026379ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 2,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 June 2009Case 31-CA-029302ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 75
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2009Case 20-CA-034538ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 25
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 June 2009Case 12-CA-026365ClosedHialeah, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 4,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 June 2009Case 08-CA-038372ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 June 2009Case 07-CA-052135ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 20-CA-034530ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 20-CA-034529ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 20-CA-034528ClosedSan Francisco, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 May 2009Case 20-CA-034526ClosedWest Sacramento, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 May 2009Case 29-CA-029621ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 2
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 May 2009Case 07-CA-052114ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 2,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 22-CA-028906ClosedSecaucus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 90,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 May 2009Case 13-CA-045306ClosedPalatine, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 350
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 May 2009Case 27-CA-021239ClosedSalt Lake City, UTRegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 15 May 2009Case 28-CA-022518ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 4,300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2009Case 34-CA-012346ClosedHartford, CTRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,400
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2009Case 29-CA-029606ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 May 2009Case 07-CA-052085ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 May 2009Case 10-CA-037865ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 May 2009Case 14-CA-029732ClosedSaint Louis, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2009Case 29-CA-029587ClosedFarmingville, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 April 2009Case 10-CA-037836ClosedAtlanta, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 April 2009Case 22-CA-028878ClosedSecaucus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 9,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 10-CA-037835ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 10-CA-037834ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 10-CA-037829ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 April 2009Case 09-CA-044919ClosedLexington, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 150
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
RC
Filed 21 April 2009Case 06-RC-012671ClosedNew Stanton, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 5
Included: All full-time and regular part-time customer counter employees employed by the Employer at its New Stanton, Pennsylvania facility; Excluding, All office clerical employees and guards, professional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 17 April 2009Case 22-CA-028868ClosedSecaucus, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 9,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2009Case 16-CA-026711ClosedAustin, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 125
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 14 April 2009Case 16-CA-026710ClosedHarlingen, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 69
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 April 2009Case 07-CA-051991ClosedLivonia, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 April 2009Case 14-CA-029704ClosedEarth City, MORegion 14Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 April 2009Case 31-CA-029189ClosedOntario, CARegion 31Workers in the unit 4,600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 6 April 2009Case 05-CA-034886ClosedSparks Glencoe, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 April 2009Case 09-CA-044879ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 March 2009Case 21-CA-038791ClosedAnaheim, CARegion 21Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 March 2009Case 29-CA-029529ClosedUniondale, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 March 2009Case 15-CA-018965ClosedShreveport, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 13 March 2009Case 01-CA-045267ClosedLondonderry, NHRegion 01Workers in the unit 950
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 11 March 2009Case 15-CA-018956ClosedPort Allen, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 30
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 26-CA-023328ClosedSpringdale, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 26-CA-023327ClosedHarrison, ARRegion 15Workers in the unit 40
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 March 2009Case 20-CA-034354ClosedAnderson, CARegion 20Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 2 March 2009Case 11-CA-022229ClosedRoanoke, VARegion 10Workers in the unit 600
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 27 February 2009Case 13-CA-045154ClosedHodgkins, ILRegion 13Workers in the unit 8,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 26 February 2009Case 09-CA-044813ClosedSharonville, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 February 2009Case 22-CA-028781ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 February 2009Case 28-CA-022354ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2009Case 19-CA-031735ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2009Case 15-CA-018929ClosedPort Allen, LARegion 15Workers in the unit 10
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 18 February 2009Case 09-CA-044796ClosedFlorence, KYRegion 09Workers in the unit 150
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 February 2009Case 08-CA-038171ClosedMiddleburg Heights, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 5,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 28 January 2009Case 09-CA-044770ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 3,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 23 January 2009Case 01-CA-045167ClosedWarwick, RIRegion 01Workers in the unit 1,200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 January 2009Case 27-CA-021124ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 16 January 2009Case 05-CA-034713ClosedHalethorpe, MDRegion 05Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 January 2009Case 11-CA-022164ClosedWest Columbia, SCRegion 10Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 8 January 2009Case 09-CA-044738ClosedCincinnati, OHRegion 09Workers in the unit 1,500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 January 2009Case 09-CA-044736ClosedSouth Charleston, WVRegion 09Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 31 December 2008Case 07-CA-051726ClosedPontiac, MIRegion 07Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2008Case 16-CA-026529ClosedMesquite, TXRegion 16Workers in the unit 2,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 22 December 2008Case 12-CA-026133ClosedJacksonville, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 December 2008Case 28-CA-022288ClosedPhoenix, AZRegion 28Workers in the unit 100
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 December 2008Case 19-CA-031653ClosedRedmond, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 170
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 24 November 2008Case 10-CA-037623ClosedHuntsville, ALRegion 10Workers in the unit 185
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 21 November 2008Case 29-CA-029295ClosedMaspeth, NYRegion 29Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 19 November 2008Case 27-CA-021077ClosedCommerce City, CORegion 27Workers in the unit 1,000
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2008Case 19-CA-031611ClosedSeattle, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 500
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 12 November 2008Case 12-CA-026087ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 5 November 2008Case 12-CA-026081ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 4 November 2008Case 08-CA-038027ClosedCleveland, OHRegion 08Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 19-CA-031599ClosedTukwila, WARegion 19Workers in the unit 200
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 3 November 2008Case 12-CA-026079ClosedTampa, FLRegion 12Workers in the unit 250
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 30 October 2008Case 10-CA-037583ClosedDoraville, GARegion 10Workers in the unit 2,000
Petition for an election
RC
Filed 30 October 2008Case 06-RC-012656ClosedNew Stanton, PARegion 06Workers in the unit 19
Included: All full time and regular part time Technical Service Group Technicians in the Laurel Mountain Region including Senior and Junior Technicians; excluding, All Office Clerical Employees, Professional Employees, Managerial Employees, Guards and Supervisors as defined in the Act.
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 29 October 2008Case 04-CA-036425ClosedReading, PARegion 04Workers in the unit 300
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 10 October 2008Case 22-CA-028591ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 22-CA-028595ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 22-CA-028594ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 22-CA-028593ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 22-CA-028592ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 22-CA-028590ClosedParsippany, NJRegion 22Workers in the unit 225
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 9 October 2008Case 11-CA-022097ClosedLumberton, NCRegion 10Workers in the unit 80
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2008Case 26-CA-023212ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2008Case 26-CA-023211ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2008Case 26-CA-023210ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700
Charge against an employer
CA
Filed 7 October 2008Case 26-CA-023209ClosedNashville, TNRegion 15Workers in the unit 2,700

Page 22 of 26, newest first: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Last refreshed 19 September 2026. What is in it, and what is not.

The Labor Board FYI is independent, and is not the Board or any government agency. Where a number here disagrees with the Board's, the Board is right: tell us at [email protected]. If a name here is a private person and not a business or a union, write to the same address and it comes off. Where this comes from.